PURPOSE: Ocular injuries following exposure to the chemical agent sulfur mustard (SM) are characterized by acute corneal erosions and inflammation of the anterior segment that may be followed by delayed Partial Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD), expressed clinically by corneal neovascularization and epithelial defects. LSCD may derive from direct destruction of limbal stem cells or indirectly from altered limbal stromal niche. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism underlying LSCD in SM injuries, focusing on the effects of the chemical on limbal epithelium. METHODS: Rabbit eyes were exposed to SM vapor and were observed by slit lamp examinations and pachymetry. Eyes were taken for histological and molecular biology evaluations at different time points (4 h-4 weeks), to include acute and delayed injuries. Epithelial stem cells were identified by ABCG2, p63 and by in vivo BrdU labeling for slow cycling cells. RESULTS: Limbal stem cells were not damaged during the acute phase following SM exposure, in contrast to the severe injury of the central corneal epithelium. On the contrary, limbal epithelium became activated, responding to corneal insult with a wound healing process, as shown by histology and by transient elevation of the stem cells markers. Simultaneously, inflammation was taking place in the limbal stroma lasting for weeks. A gradual loss of stem cells was observed later-on (2-4 weeks), associated with typical symptoms of LSCD. CONCLUSIONS: LSCD associated with SM ocular toxicity was not derived from a direct cytotoxic effect on the epithelial stem cells, but apparently from pathological events at the limbal stroma, that produced an abnormal microenvironment for the stem cells, triggering their gradual death. The results, and in particular the absence of a primary damage to the epithelial stem cells, indicate the presence of a therapeutic window for intervention to avoid the development of the delayed LSCD.
PURPOSE:Ocular injuries following exposure to the chemical agent sulfur mustard (SM) are characterized by acute corneal erosions and inflammation of the anterior segment that may be followed by delayed Partial Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD), expressed clinically by corneal neovascularization and epithelial defects. LSCD may derive from direct destruction of limbal stem cells or indirectly from altered limbal stromal niche. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism underlying LSCD in SM injuries, focusing on the effects of the chemical on limbal epithelium. METHODS:Rabbit eyes were exposed to SM vapor and were observed by slit lamp examinations and pachymetry. Eyes were taken for histological and molecular biology evaluations at different time points (4 h-4 weeks), to include acute and delayed injuries. Epithelial stem cells were identified by ABCG2, p63 and by in vivo BrdU labeling for slow cycling cells. RESULTS: Limbal stem cells were not damaged during the acute phase following SM exposure, in contrast to the severe injury of the central corneal epithelium. On the contrary, limbal epithelium became activated, responding to corneal insult with a wound healing process, as shown by histology and by transient elevation of the stem cells markers. Simultaneously, inflammation was taking place in the limbal stroma lasting for weeks. A gradual loss of stem cells was observed later-on (2-4 weeks), associated with typical symptoms of LSCD. CONCLUSIONS: LSCD associated with SMocular toxicity was not derived from a direct cytotoxic effect on the epithelial stem cells, but apparently from pathological events at the limbal stroma, that produced an abnormal microenvironment for the stem cells, triggering their gradual death. The results, and in particular the absence of a primary damage to the epithelial stem cells, indicate the presence of a therapeutic window for intervention to avoid the development of the delayed LSCD.
Authors: Dinesh G Goswami; Rama Kant; David A Ammar; Dileep Kumar; Robert W Enzenauer; J Mark Petrash; Neera Tewari-Singh; Rajesh Agarwal Journal: Exp Mol Pathol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 3.362
Authors: Patrick M McNutt; Kaylie M Tuznik; Elliot J Glotfelty; Marian R Nelson; Megan E Lyman; Tracey A Hamilton Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Choy Ker-Woon; Norzana Abd Ghafar; Chua Kien Hui; Yasmin Anum Mohd Yusof; Wan Zurinah Wan Ngah Journal: BMC Cell Biol Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Andrea DeSantis-Rodrigues; Yoke-Chen Chang; Rita A Hahn; Iris P Po; Peihong Zhou; C Jeffrey Lacey; Abhilash Pillai; Sherri C Young; Robert A Flowers; Michael A Gallo; Jeffrey D Laskin; Donald R Gerecke; Kathy K H Svoboda; Ned D Heindel; Marion K Gordon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.799