Literature DB >> 21988399

Prevalence of Clostridium difficile toxin genes in the feces of veal calves and incidence of ground veal contamination.

Beth A Houser1, Marty K Soehnlen, David R Wolfgang, Hannah R Lysczek, Carol M Burns, Bhushan M Jayarao.   

Abstract

A study was conducted in two parts to determine the prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in veal calves and retail meat. The first part of the study focused on the veal production continuum (farm to abattoir). Fifty calves from 4 veal herds (n=200) were followed for 18-22 weeks from the time of arrival on the veal farm to the time of slaughter. Fecal samples were collected from calves every 4-6 weeks. Half of the calves included in the study (n=100) were followed to the abattoir where carcass swabs were collected post slaughter. Fecal samples and carcass swabs were screened for genes encoding C. difficile toxins TcdA, TcdB, and CDT by using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Carcass swabs were also screened for toxigenic C. difficile by using traditional culture methods. In the second part of the study, ground veal products (n=50 samples) purchased from local grocery stores were examined for toxigenic C. difficile by using real-time PCR and traditional culture methods. Fecal samples from 56 of 200 (28%) calves tested positive for C. difficile toxin genes at least once over the course of the study. Calf age (p=0.011) influenced prevalence of C. difficile toxin genes in calf feces. Toxin genes of C. difficile were detected in one carcass swab by multiplex real-time PCR only. Toxigenic C. difficile was detected by PCR and culture in four (8%) and three (6%) ground veal samples, respectively. The findings of the study reveal that toxigenic C. difficile was most prevalent in veal calves (12%) just before slaughter, although viable toxigenic C. difficile was not recovered from veal carcasses. On the contrary, viable toxigenic C. difficle was recovered from 6% retail meat, thus suggesting that contamination occurs either during or after veal fabrication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21988399     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2011.0955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Prevalence of Clostridium difficile isolated from various raw meats in Korea.

Authors:  Joo Young Lee; Da Yeon Lee; Yong Sun Cho
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.391

3.  Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in uncooked ground meat products from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Scott R Curry; Jane W Marsh; Jessica L Schlackman; Lee H Harrison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Scott Curry
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Nationwide surveillance study of Clostridium difficile in Australian neonatal pigs shows high prevalence and heterogeneity of PCR ribotypes.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Cross-sectional study reveals high prevalence of Clostridium difficile non-PCR ribotype 078 strains in Australian veal calves at slaughter.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Sara Thean; Papanin Putsathit; Stan Fenwick; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

8.  Occurrence of Clostridium difficile in seasoned hamburgers and seven processing plants in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Esfandiari; Scott Weese; Hamid Ezzatpanah; Mohammad Jalali; Mohammad Chamani
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Identification of risk factors influencing Clostridium difficile prevalence in middle-size dairy farms.

Authors:  Petra Bandelj; Rok Blagus; France Briski; Olga Frlic; Aleksandra Vergles Rataj; Maja Rupnik; Matjaz Ocepek; Modest Vengust
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Prevalence and Characterization of Clostridium difficile in Beef and Mutton Meats of Isfahan Region, Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Esfandiari; Mohammad Jalali; Hamid Ezzatpanah; J Scott Weese; Mohammad Chamani
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 0.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.