Literature DB >> 21987267

Addition of species abundance and performance predicts community primary production of macroalgae.

Robert J Miller1, Shannon Harrer, Daniel C Reed.   

Abstract

Understory plant assemblages are important sources of primary production in both terrestrial and marine environments, and they may exhibit different dynamics than their overstory counterparts. For example, production within dense upper canopies is typically light-limited by shading, whereas such canopy architecture effects are likely unimportant in low-light environments, such as those inhabited by sparser understory assemblages. In these assemblages, light saturation of understory production may be common as species become limited by their photosynthetic capacity, which is adapted to low-light levels. Here we show that a simple model relating species-specific light use relationships measured in the laboratory to biomass and light levels measured in nature accurately predicts community gross primary production (GPP) in a marine understory algal community. We validate the model by comparing GPP measured in situ in enclosed chambers with model estimates for the same incubations. Model estimates of GPP explained 70% of the variation in the measured estimates. The results show that GPP was accurately estimated by simple addition of the photosynthetic capacity of each species in the community based on their biomass and the available light. The difference between modeled and measured GPP did not show any relationship with community biomass or diversity, and the results suggest that diversity does not significantly affect productivity in this system. This type of model should be applicable in other environments where canopy architecture does not play a significant role in limiting photosynthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987267     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2143-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant Communities.

Authors:  Just Cebrian
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Highly predictable photosynthetic production in natural macroalgal communities from incoming and absorbed light.

Authors:  Anne Lise Middelboe; Kaj Sand-Jensen; Thomas Binzer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The use of remote sensing in light use efficiency based models of gross primary production: a review of current status and future requirements.

Authors:  Thomas Hilker; Nicholas C Coops; Michael A Wulder; T Andrew Black; Robert D Guy
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Linkages between phenology, pollination, photosynthesis, and reproduction in deciduous forest understory plants.

Authors:  Gaku Kudo; Takashi Y Ida; Tomokazu Tani
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Effects of macroalgal species identity and richness on primary production in benthic marine communities.

Authors:  John F Bruno; Katharyn E Boyer; J E Duffy; Sarah C Lee; Johanna S Kertesz
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Coral reef primary productivity. A hierarchy of pattern and process.

Authors:  B G Hatcher
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Regional and local impact on species diversity - from pattern to processes.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Thorsten Blenckner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Plant competition for light analyzed with a multispecies canopy model : I. Model development and influence of enhanced UV-B conditions on photosynthesis in mixed wheat and wild oat canopies.

Authors:  R J Ryel; P W Barnes; W Beyschlag; M M Caldwell; S D Flint
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Density derived estimates of standing crop and net primary production in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera.

Authors:  Daniel Reed; Andrew Rassweiler; Katie Arkema
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.573

10.  Flow and flexibility. II. The roles of size and shape in determining wave forces on the bull kelp nereocystis luetkeana

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Light dose versus rate of delivery: implications for macroalgal productivity.

Authors:  Matthew J Desmond; Daniel W Pritchard; Christopher D Hepburn
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Blade life span, structural investment, and nutrient allocation in giant kelp.

Authors:  Gabriel E Rodriguez; Daniel C Reed; Sally J Holbrook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of five southern California macroalgal diets on consumption, growth, and gonad weight, in the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Matthew C Foster; Jarrett E K Byrnes; Daniel C Reed
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Shining light on benthic macroalgae: mechanisms of complementarity in layered macroalgal assemblages.

Authors:  Leigh W Tait; Ian Hawes; David R Schiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.