BACKGROUND: During the past decade, a trend has been observed in the United States toward initiation of chronic dialysis at higher levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate. This likely reflects secular trends in the composition of the dialysis population and a tendency toward initiation of dialysis earlier in the course of kidney disease. METHODS: The goal of this study was to generate model-based estimates of the magnitude of changes in the timing of dialysis initiation between 1997 and 2007. We used information from a national registry for end-stage renal disease on estimated glomerular filtration rate at initiation among patients who received their first chronic dialysis treatment in 1997 or 2007. We used information regarding predialysis estimated glomerular filtration rate slope from an integrated health care system. RESULTS: After accounting for changes in the characteristics of new US dialysis patients from 1997 to 2007, we estimate that chronic dialysis was initiated a mean of 147 days earlier (95% confidence interval, 134-160) in the later compared with the earlier year. Differences in timing were consistent across a range of patient subgroups but were most pronounced for those aged 75 years or older; the mean difference in timing in that subgroup was 233 days (95% confidence interval, 206-267). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic dialysis appears to have been initiated substantially earlier in the course of kidney disease in 2007 compared with 1997. In the absence of strong evidence to suggest that earlier initiation of chronic dialysis is beneficial, these findings call for careful evaluation of contemporary dialysis initiation practices in the United States.
BACKGROUND: During the past decade, a trend has been observed in the United States toward initiation of chronic dialysis at higher levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate. This likely reflects secular trends in the composition of the dialysis population and a tendency toward initiation of dialysis earlier in the course of kidney disease. METHODS: The goal of this study was to generate model-based estimates of the magnitude of changes in the timing of dialysis initiation between 1997 and 2007. We used information from a national registry for end-stage renal disease on estimated glomerular filtration rate at initiation among patients who received their first chronic dialysis treatment in 1997 or 2007. We used information regarding predialysis estimated glomerular filtration rate slope from an integrated health care system. RESULTS: After accounting for changes in the characteristics of new US dialysis patients from 1997 to 2007, we estimate that chronic dialysis was initiated a mean of 147 days earlier (95% confidence interval, 134-160) in the later compared with the earlier year. Differences in timing were consistent across a range of patient subgroups but were most pronounced for those aged 75 years or older; the mean difference in timing in that subgroup was 233 days (95% confidence interval, 206-267). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic dialysis appears to have been initiated substantially earlier in the course of kidney disease in 2007 compared with 1997. In the absence of strong evidence to suggest that earlier initiation of chronic dialysis is beneficial, these findings call for careful evaluation of contemporary dialysis initiation practices in the United States.
Authors: Srinivasan Beddhu; Matthew H Samore; Mark S Roberts; Gregory J Stoddard; Nirupama Ramkumar; Lisa M Pappas; Alfred K Cheung Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Fliss E M Murtagh; James E Marsh; Paul Donohoe; Nasirul J Ekbal; Neil S Sheerin; Fiona E Harris Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Lih-Wen Mau; Jiannong Liu; Yang Qiu; Haifeng Guo; Areef Ishani; Thomas J Arneson; David T Gilbertson; Stephan C Dunning; Allan J Collins Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Bruce A Cooper; Pauline Branley; Liliana Bulfone; John F Collins; Jonathan C Craig; Margaret B Fraenkel; Anthony Harris; David W Johnson; Joan Kesselhut; Jing Jing Li; Grant Luxton; Andrew Pilmore; David J Tiller; David C Harris; Carol A Pollock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deidra C Crews; Julia J Scialla; Jiannong Liu; Haifeng Guo; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Patti L Ephraim; Bernard G Jaar; Stephen M Sozio; Dana C Miskulin; Navdeep Tangri; Tariq Shafi; Klemens B Meyer; Albert W Wu; Neil R Powe; L Ebony Boulware Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Susan P Wong; Margaret K Yu; Bruce Wynar; Mark Perkins; Chuan-Fen Liu; Jaclyn M Lemon; Paul L Hebert Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Deidra C Crews; Julia J Scialla; L Ebony Boulware; Sankar D Navaneethan; Joseph V Nally; Xiaobo Liu; Susana Arrigain; Jesse D Schold; Patti L Ephraim; Stacey E Jolly; Stephen M Sozio; Wieneke M Michels; Dana C Miskulin; Navdeep Tangri; Tariq Shafi; Albert W Wu; Karen Bandeen-Roche Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Elani Streja; Csaba Pal Kovesdy; Melissa Soohoo; Yoshitsugu Obi; Connie M Rhee; Christina Park; Joline L T Chen; Tracy Nakata; Danh V Nguyen; Alpesh N Amin; Steven J Jacobsen; John J Sim; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 8.237