Literature DB >> 21987029

Determinants and stability over time of perception of health risks related to mobile phone base stations.

Bernd Kowall1, Jürgen Breckenkamp, Maria Blettner, Brigitte Schlehofer, Joachim Schüz, Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perception of possible health risks related to mobile phone base stations (MPBS) is an important factor in citizens' opposition against MPBS and is associated with health complaints. The aim of the present study is to assess whether risk perception of MPBS is associated with concerns about other environmental and health risks, is associated with psychological strain, and is stable on the individual level over time.
METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires filled in by 3,253 persons aged 15-69 years in 2004 and 2006 in Germany.
RESULTS: Risk perception of MPBS was strongly associated with concerns about various other risks like side effects of medications, air pollution or electric power lines. Persons showing more anxiety, depression, or stress were more often concerned about MPBS and also more often attributed health complaints to MPBS. 46.7% of those concerned about MPBS in 2004 expressed these concerns again 2 years later, the corresponding figure for attribution of health complaints to MPBS was 31.3%.
CONCLUSION: Risk perception of MPBS is strongly associated with general concern, anxiety, depression, and stress, and rather instable over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987029     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-011-0310-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  12 in total

1.  Attitudes about electric and magnetic fields: do scientists and other risk experts perceive risk similarly?

Authors:  Shari McMahan; Rafer Lutz; Jon'a Meyer
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.179

2.  Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations.

Authors:  H-P Hutter; H Moshammer; P Wallner; M Kundi
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland.

Authors:  Nadja Schreier; Anke Huss; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2006

4.  Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults: a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry.

Authors:  Silke Thomas; Anja Kühnlein; Sabine Heinrich; Georg Praml; Dennis Nowak; Rüdiger von Kries; Katja Radon
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Perception of mobile phone and base station risks.

Authors:  Michael Siegrist; Timothy C Earle; Heinz Gutscher; Carmen Keller
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  Neuropsychiatric and somatic characteristics of young adults with and without self-reported chemical odor intolerance and chemical sensitivity.

Authors:  I R Bell; C S Miller; G E Schwartz; J M Peterson; D Amend
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

7.  Do mobile phone base stations affect sleep of residents? Results from an experimental double-blind sham-controlled field study.

Authors:  Heidi Danker-Hopfe; Hans Dorn; Christian Bornkessel; Cornelia Sauter
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany.

Authors:  M Blettner; B Schlehofer; J Breckenkamp; B Kowall; S Schmiedel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz; G Berg-Beckhoff
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  G Berg-Beckhoff; M Blettner; B Kowall; J Breckenkamp; B Schlehofer; S Schmiedel; C Bornkessel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Public perception of risk concerning celltowers and mobile phones.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Hutter; Hanns Moshammer; Peter Wallner; Michael Kundi
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2004
View more
  8 in total

1.  A web search on environmental topics: what is the role of ranking?

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Barbara Filisetti; Silvia Mascaretti; Rosa Maria Limina; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Problematic mobile phone use in adolescents: derivation of a short scale MPPUS-10.

Authors:  Milena Foerster; Katharina Roser; Anna Schoeni; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Health responses to a new high-voltage power line route: design of a quasi-experimental prospective field study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jarry T Porsius; Liesbeth Claassen; Tjabe Smid; Fred Woudenberg; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Electrohypersensitivity as a Newly Identified and Characterized Neurologic Pathological Disorder: How to Diagnose, Treat, and Prevent It.

Authors:  Dominique Belpomme; Philippe Irigaray
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Personal Exposure Assessment to Wi-Fi Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Mexican Microenvironments.

Authors:  Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio; Isabel Escobar; Carmen Del Pilar Suarez Rodriguez; Enrique Arribas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Adolescents' risk perceptions on mobile phones and their base stations, their trust to authorities and incivility in using mobile phones: a cross-sectional survey on 2240 high school students in Izmir, Turkey.

Authors:  Hur Hassoy; Raika Durusoy; Ali Osman Karababa
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 7.  Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses.

Authors:  Maël Dieudonné
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Factors Affecting Risk Perception of Electromagnetic Waves From 5G Network Base Stations.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Koh; Jae Wook Choi; Myungsoon Seo; Hyung-Do Choi; KyungHee Kim
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.010

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.