P Krumm1, C Schraml, C Bretschneider, A Seeger, B Klumpp, U Kramer, C D Claussen, S Miller.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Detailed knowledge of the venous mesenteric system is important for gastrointestinal surgery, particularly for transplantation planning and surgery and for the comprehension of perioperative complications that may influence patient outcome. Data about the mesenteric venous anatomy in the literature varies substantially. The purpose of this study was to categorize venous mesenteric variants and to determine their incidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 916 patients requiring diagnostic abdominal CT in the portal venous phase. The mesenteric vein anatomy was categorized as follows: 1. the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) enters the splenic vein (SV); 2. the IMV enters into the angle of the confluence of the SV and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) forming the portal vein (PV); 3. the IMV enters the SMV; 4. seven rare variants. We measured the diameters of the veins and distances from the confluence to the IMV origins.
RESULTS: The frequency of variants was: 1. 37.6%, 2. 28.8%; 3. 19.2%. The rare variants totaled 14.4%. The average vessel diameters measured in cm: PV 1.48; SV 1.02; SMV 1.2; IMV 0.5. The mean IMV entering distances were 1.66 cm in variant 1 and 0.75 cm in variant 3.
CONCLUSION: The three common variants (1, 2 and 3) are the most relevant ones. 14.4% of patients had different anatomic variants. The variability of the mesenteric venous system was higher than previously published. Knowledge of rare variants is important to avoid complications in abdominal surgery. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PURPOSE: Detailed knowledge of the venous mesenteric system is important for gastrointestinal surgery, particularly for transplantation planning and surgery and for the comprehension of perioperative complications that may influence patient outcome. Data about the mesenteric venous anatomy in the literature varies substantially. The purpose of this study was to categorize venous mesenteric variants and to determine their incidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 916 patients requiring diagnostic abdominal CT in the portal venous phase. The mesenteric vein anatomy was categorized as follows: 1. the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) enters the splenic vein (SV); 2. the IMV enters into the angle of the confluence of the SV and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) forming the portal vein (PV); 3. the IMV enters the SMV; 4. seven rare variants. We measured the diameters of the veins and distances from the confluence to the IMV origins.
RESULTS: The frequency of variants was: 1. 37.6%, 2. 28.8%; 3. 19.2%. The rare variants totaled 14.4%. The average vessel diameters measured in cm: PV 1.48; SV 1.02; SMV 1.2; IMV 0.5. The mean IMV entering distances were 1.66 cm in variant 1 and 0.75 cm in variant 3.
CONCLUSION: The three common variants (1, 2 and 3) are the most relevant ones. 14.4% of patients had different anatomic variants. The variability of the mesenteric venous system was higher than previously published. Knowledge of rare variants is important to avoid complications in abdominal surgery. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2011
PMID： 21986867 DOI： 10.1055/s-0031-1281745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rofo ISSN： 1438-9010