Literature DB >> 21986645

Is fixation during gastric banding necessary? A randomised clinical study.

A Lazzati1, C Polliand, M Porta, A Torcivia, L A Paolino, G Champault, C Barrat.   

Abstract

Anterior fixation via a gastro-gastric suture in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is commonly performed to prevent band-related complications. However, the necessity of this common technique has never been proven. Not fixing the band would be time sparing and would reduce adhesions on the stomach and probably make revisional surgery easier. This study was conceived as a 3-year randomised clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of the non-fixation technique. From December 2006 to December 2007, 81 patients undergoing LAGB were randomly distributed into two groups: group A, with gastro-gastric sutures (n = 41) and group B, without gastro-gastric fixation (n = 40). The two groups were equivalent regarding initial body mass index (BMI), age and sex ratio. The main outcome was postoperative complications and secondary outcomes were operative time and weight loss expressed by the percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL). All patients were prospectively followed up for 2 years. The mean preoperative BMI was 42.5 kg/m² (35-56). All patients were available for follow-up at 2 years. The mean overall preoperative time was 82 ± 20 min for the fixation group and 72 ± 20 min for the non-fixation group (p = 0.13). The mean hospital stay was 4.1 ± 1.5 days (no significant difference between the two groups). The 2-year %EBMIL was 35.9 for group A and 39.4 for group B (p = NS). The mean BMI at 2 years was 36.3 and 36.1, respectively, with no statistical difference. We observed three early band slippages in the non-fixation group and none in the fixation group. Three bands were removed during the second year of follow-up for causes other than band slippage (no significant difference between the two groups). This study was interrupted before a statistical significance could be reached, under the general agreement of all participating surgeons, because of the three unexpected early band slippages. For the patients who did not suffer from this complication, we did not observe any differences between the two groups in terms of late complications and weight loss. The operative time was shorter in the non-fixation group. This randomised clinical trial suggests that care should be taken when not fixating the LAGB because of the risk of early postoperative band slippage. We suggest that fixing the LAGB by gastro-gastric sutures should remain common practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21986645     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0523-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  13 in total

1.  [Are complications of gastric banding decreased with cuff fixation?].

Authors:  M Kasalický; M Fried; M Pesková
Journal:  Sb Lek       Date:  2002

2.  Pouch dilatation and slippage after adjustable gastric banding: is it still an issue?

Authors:  Jerome Dargent
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience.

Authors:  R Weiner; R Blanco-Engert; S Weiner; R Matkowitz; L Schaefer; I Pomhoff
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Slippage after adjustable gastric banding according to the pars flaccida and the perigastric approach.

Authors:  M Khoursheed; I Al-Bader; A I Mohammad; M O Soliman; H Dashti
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Prevention of pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Zappa; Giancarlo Micheletto; Ezio Lattuada; Enrico Mozzi; Alessandra Spinola; Massimo Meco; Giancarlo Roviaro; Santo Bressani Doldi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Adjustable gastric banding outcomes with and without gastrogastric imbrication sutures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Karin Dolezalova; Petra Sramkova
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 7.  [Surgery for morbid obesity: 2. Complications. Results of a Technologic Evaluation by the ANAES].

Authors:  S Msika
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  2003-02

8.  Clinical and radiological follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands, 1998 and 2000: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  George A Fielding; Jennifer E Duncombe
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Systematic review of same-day laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery.

Authors:  Harun Thomas; Sanjay Agrawal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  The "Birmingham stitch"--avoiding slippage in laparoscopic gastric banding.

Authors:  Rishi Singhal; Mark Kitchen; Sandra Ndirika; Kathryn Hunt; Sue Bridgwater; Paul Super
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  3 in total

1.  Slippage-a Significant Problem Following Gastric Banding-a Single Centre Experience.

Authors:  Tomasz Szewczyk; Przemyslaw Janczak; Natalia Jezierska; Piotr Jurałowicz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Three-year experience of pouch dilatation and slippage management after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Woon Ki Lee; Seong Min Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Prospective, double center, 1-year results of adjustable gastric banding with MIDBAND (gastro-gastric suture vs. non-gastro-gastric suture).

Authors:  Sang-Moon Han; Seong Min Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.