Literature DB >> 21984968

The prognostic value of FGFR3 mutational status for disease recurrence and progression depends on allelic losses at 9p22.

Guillaume Ploussard1, Hany Soliman, Francis Dubosq, Paul Méria, Jérôme Vérine, François Desgrand-Champs, Hugues Dethé, Pierre Mongiat-Artus.   

Abstract

Developing molecular markers that define high-risk lesions is clinically critical for improving the prognosis determination of the tumors and their treatment. We decided to focus on the two pathways involving FGFR3 and allelic losses at 9p22 to identify a potential combined role in predicting tumor recurrence, progression and/or muscle. Microsatellite and mutational FGFR3 status analyses was performed in tumor tissue of 58 patients in a prospective unicentre study. The results of microsatellite and FGFR3 analyses were dichotomized as follows: loss of heterozygos-ity (LOH) versus retention of heterozygosity (ROH) on the one hand; mutant FGFR3 (mtFGFR3) versus wild-type FGFR3 (wtFGFR3) on the other hand. The combined 9p22/FGFR3 status was strongly correlated with stage (p=0.001) and grade (p<0.001) whereas the single FGFR3 mutational status was not able to predict recurrence, progression or muscle invasion. The survival curves corresponding to each combined status (mtFGFR3/ROH, wtFGFR3/ROH, mtFGFR3/LOH, wtFGFR3/LOH) were significantly different for recurrence (p=0.008), progression (p=0.046) and progression to muscle invasive disease (p=0.004). In case of 9p22 LOH, the FGFR3 mutational status was strongly associated with different clinical outcomes. In a multivariate model, the combined wtFGFR3/9p22 LOH status remained significant in predicting oncologic outcomes. FGFR3 mutations strongly characterize tumors with low malignant potential and favourable clinical outcome in case of allelic losses at 9p22, whereas its prognostic value becomes null or slightly inverts in case of allelic stability. Thus, our findings may also lead to further experiments in order to study interactions between FGFR3 and genes located at 9p22, as CDKN2A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; FGFR3; loss of heterozygosity; mutations; prognosis

Year:  2011        PMID: 21984968      PMCID: PMC3186048     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  27 in total

1.  Prospective study of FGFR3 mutations as a prognostic factor in nonmuscle invasive urothelial bladder carcinomas.

Authors:  Silvia Hernández; Elena López-Knowles; Josep Lloreta; Manolis Kogevinas; Alex Amorós; Adonina Tardón; Alfredo Carrato; Consol Serra; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Homozygous deletion mapping at 9p21 in bladder carcinoma defines a critical region within 2cM of IFNA.

Authors:  J Devlin; A J Keen; M A Knowles
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Prognostic implications of aberrations in p16/pRb pathway in urothelial bladder carcinomas: a multivariate analysis including p53 expression and proliferation markers.

Authors:  P Korkolopoulou; P Christodoulou; A Lazaris; E Thomas-Tsagli; P Kapralos; A Papanikolaou; I Kalliteraki; P Davaris
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Generation of a concise gene panel for outcome prediction in urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Dongyun Yang; Frederic M Waldman; Ram H Datar; Donald G Skinner; Susan Groshen; Richard J Cote
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  FGFR3 and TP53 gene mutations define two distinct pathways in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Ashraf A Bakkar; Herve Wallerand; François Radvanyi; Jean-Baptiste Lahaye; Serge Pissard; Laure Lecerf; Jean Claude Kouyoumdjian; Claude C Abbou; Jean-Claude Pairon; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Jean-Paul Thiery; Dominique K Chopin; Sixtina Gil Diez de Medina
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Role of chromosome 9 in human bladder cancer.

Authors:  N Miyao; Y C Tsai; S P Lerner; A F Olumi; C H Spruck; M Gonzalez-Zulueta; P W Nichols; D G Skinner; P A Jones
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Microsatellite alterations in human bladder cancer: detection of tumor cells in urine sediment and tumor tissue.

Authors:  Andreas P Berger; Walther Parson; Arnulf Stenzl; Hannes Steiner; Georg Bartsch; Helmut Klocker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Loss of P16 expression and chromosome 9p21 LOH in predicting outcome of patients affected by superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo Bartoletti; Tommaso Cai; Gabriella Nesi; Lucia Roberta Girardi; Gianna Baroni; Maurizio Dal Canto
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 9.  Genetic alterations in urothelial bladder carcinoma: an updated review.

Authors:  Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia; Richard T Cheney; Juerg Schwaller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prediction of progression in pTa and pT1 bladder carcinomas with p53, p16 and pRb.

Authors:  A W Hitchings; M Kumar; S Jordan; V Nargund; J Martin; D M Berney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Prognostic Value of FGFR3 Expression in Patients with T1 Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Danijel Sikic; Helge Taubert; Johannes Breyer; Markus Eckstein; Veronika Weyerer; Bastian Keck; Jennifer Kubon; Wolfgang Otto; Thomas S Worst; Maximilian C Kriegmair; Philipp Erben; Arndt Hartmann; Bernd Wullich; Ralph M Wirtz; Sven Wach
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  A Decade of FGF Receptor Research in Bladder Cancer: Past, Present, and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Erica di Martino; Darren C Tomlinson; Margaret A Knowles
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-31

Review 3.  Advances in urinary biomarker discovery in urological research.

Authors:  Jayoung Kim; Won Tae Kim; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-12-31

4.  Establishment of a Necroptosis-Related Prognostic Signature to Reveal Immune Infiltration and Predict Drug Sensitivity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Huili Ren; Jianglin Zheng; Qi Cheng; Xiaoyan Yang; Qin Fu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.