Literature DB >> 21984869

Hydrophobicity profiles in G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane helical domains.

Chiquito J Crasto1.   

Abstract

The lack of a crystallographically derived structure for all but three G (TP [guanosine triphosphate]-binding) protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) proteins necessitates the use of computationally derived methods to determine their structures. Computational methodologies allow a mechanistic glimpse into GPCR-ligand interactions at a molecular level to better understand the initial steps leading to a protein's biologic functions, ie, protecting the ligands that activate, deactivate, or inhibit the protein, stabilizing protein structure in the membrane's lipid bilayer, and ensuring that the hydrophilic environment within the GPCR-binding pocket is maintained. Described here is a formalism that quantifies the amphiphilic nature of a helix, by determining the effective hydrophobicity (or hydrophilicity) at specific positions around it. This formalism will enable computational protein modelers to position helices so that the functional aspects of GPCRs are adequately represented in the model. Hydro-Eff®, an online tool, allows users to calculate effective helical hydrophobicities.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21984869      PMCID: PMC3187720          DOI: 10.2147/JRLCR.S14437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Receptor Ligand Channel Res        ISSN: 1178-699X


  59 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 A crystal structure.

Authors:  Tetsuji Okada; Minoru Sugihara; Ana-Nicoleta Bondar; Marcus Elstner; Peter Entel; Volker Buss
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  G proteins: more than transducers of receptor-generated signals?

Authors:  Stefan Engelhardt; Francesca Rochais
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Test of the Binding Threshold Hypothesis for olfactory receptors: explanation of the differential binding of ketones to the mouse and human orthologs of olfactory receptor 912-93.

Authors:  Patrick Hummel; Nagarajan Vaidehi; Wely B Floriano; Spencer E Hall; William A Goddard
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Membrane proteins: amino acid sequence and membrane penetration.

Authors:  J P Segrest; R J Feldmann
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1974-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Structural prediction of membrane-bound proteins.

Authors:  P Argos; J K Rao; P A Hargrave
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1982-11-15

7.  Trans-membrane translocation of proteins. The direct transfer model.

Authors:  G von Heijne; C Blomberg
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1979-06

8.  Population differences in the human functional olfactory repertoire.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Ligand binding to the porcine adipose tissue beta-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  H J Mersmann; R L McNeel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Jaakola; Mark T Griffith; Michael A Hanson; Vadim Cherezov; Ellen Y T Chien; J Robert Lane; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preferential binding of an odor within olfactory receptors: a precursor to receptor activation.

Authors:  Peter C Lai; Brandon Guida; Jing Shi; Chiquito J Crasto
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Beyond modeling: all-atom olfactory receptor model simulations.

Authors:  Peter C Lai; Chiquito J Crasto
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.