Literature DB >> 21984690

A prospective multicenter study on the outcome of type I collagen hydrogel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (CaReS) for the repair of articular cartilage defects in the knee.

Ulrich Schneider1, Lars Rackwitz, Stefan Andereya, Sebastian Siebenlist, Florian Fensky, Johannes Reichert, Ingo Löer, Thomas Barthel, Maximilian Rudert, Ulrich Nöth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cartilage Regeneration System (CaReS) is a novel matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) technique for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions (Outerbridge grades III and IV). For this technology, no expansion of the chondrocytes in a monolayer culture is needed, and a homogeneous cell distribution within the gel is guaranteed.
PURPOSE: To report a prospective multicenter study of matrix-associated ACI of the knee using a new type I collagen hydrogel (CaReS). STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: From 2003 to 2008, 116 patients (49 women and 67 men; mean age, 32.5 ± 8.9 years) had CaReS implantation of the knee in 9 different centers. On the basis of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package 2000, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]), SF-36 score, overall treatment satisfaction and the IKDC functional status were evaluated. Patient follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter. Mean follow-up was 30.2 ± 17.4 months (range, 12-60 months). There were 67 defects of the medial condyle, 14 of the lateral, 22 of the patella/trochlea, and 3 of the tibial plateau, and 10 patients had 2 lesions. The mean defect size was 5.4 ± 2.4 cm(2). Thirty percent of the defects were <4 cm(2) and 70% were >4 cm(2).
RESULTS: The IKDC score improved significantly from 42.4 ± 13.8 preoperatively to 70.5 ± 18.7 (P < .001) at latest follow-up. Global pain level significantly decreased (P < .001) from 6.7 ± 2.2 preoperatively to 3.2 ± 3.1 at latest follow-up. There also was a significant increase of both components of the SF-36 score. The overall treatment satisfaction was judged as very good or good in 88% by the surgeon and 80% by the patient. The IKDC functional knee status was grade I in 23.4%, II in 56.3%, III in 17.2%, and IV in 3.1% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Matrix-associated ACI employing the CaReS technology for the treatment of chondral or osteochondral defects of the knee is a safe and clinically effective treatment that yields significant functional improvement and improvement in pain level. However, further investigation is necessary to determine the long-term viability and clinical outcome of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21984690     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511423369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  30 in total

1.  Repair tissue quality after arthroscopic autologous collagen-induced chondrogenesis (ACIC) assessed via T2* mapping.

Authors:  David Stelzeneder; Ananthram A Shetty; Seok-Jung Kim; Siegfried Trattnig; Stephan E Domayer; Vishvas Shetty; Praveen Bilagi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  [Reconstruction of osteochondral defects with a collagen I hydrogel. Results of a prospective multicenter study].

Authors:  L Rackwitz; U Schneider; S Andereya; S Siebenlist; J C Reichert; F Fensky; J Arnholdt; J Arnhold; I Löer; R Grossstück; W Zinser; T Barthel; M Rudert; U Nöth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Skeletal tissue regeneration: where can hydrogels play a role?

Authors:  Liliana S Moreira Teixeira; Jennifer Patterson; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Chondrogenic Gene Expression Differences between Chondrocytes from Osteoarthritic and Non-OA Trauma Joints in a 3D Collagen Type I Hydrogel.

Authors:  Vivek Jeyakumar; Florian Halbwirth; Eugenia Niculescu-Morzsa; Christoph Bauer; Hannes Zwickl; Daniela Kern; Stefan Nehrer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair.

Authors:  Heenam Kwon; Wendy E Brown; Cassandra A Lee; Dean Wang; Nikolaos Paschos; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  In Vitro Analysis of Cartilage Regeneration Using a Collagen Type I Hydrogel (CaReS) in the Bovine Cartilage Punch Model.

Authors:  Victoria Horbert; Long Xin; Peter Foehr; Olaf Brinkmann; Matthias Bungartz; Rainer H Burgkart; T Graeve; Raimund W Kinne
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Brian J Huang; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation: Is it likely to become a saviour of large-sized and full-thickness cartilage defect in young adult knee?

Authors:  Chi Zhang; You-Zhi Cai; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Use of cell-free collagen type I matrix implants for the treatment of small cartilage defects in the knee: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Karl F Schüttler; Hanno Schenker; Christina Theisen; Markus D Schofer; Alan Getgood; Philip P Roessler; Johannes Struewer; Marga B Rominger; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in the United States.

Authors:  Scott R Montgomery; Brock D Foster; Stephanie S Ngo; Rodney D Terrell; Jeffrey C Wang; Frank A Petrigliano; David R McAllister
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.