Literature DB >> 21984167

Wound ballistic evaluation of the Taser® XREP ammunition.

Sebastian N Kunz1, Jiri Adamec, Bettina Zinka, Daniela Münzel, Peter B Noël, Simon Eichner, Axel Manthei, Nico Grove, M Graw, Oliver Peschel.   

Abstract

The Taser® eXtended Range Electronic Projectile (XREP®) is a wireless conducted electrical weapon (CEW) designed to incapacitate a person from a larger distance. The aim of this study was to analyze the ballistic injury potential of the XREP. Twenty rounds were fired from the Taser®X12 TM shotgun into ballistic soap covered with artificial skin and clothing at different shooting distances (1-25 m). One shot was fired at pig skin at a shooting distance of 10 m. The average projectile velocity was 67.0 m/s. The kinetic energy levels on impact varied from 28-52 J. Depending on the intermediate target, the projectiles penetrated up to 4.2 cm into the ballistic soap. On impact the nose assembly did not separate from the chassis, and no electrical activation was registered. Upon impact, a skin penetration of the XREP cannot be excluded. However, it is very unlikely at shooting distances of 10 m or more. Clothing and a high elasticity limit of the target body area can significantly reduce the penetration risk on impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21984167     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-011-0628-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  22 in total

1.  Sudden death of a young hockey player: case report of commotio cordis.

Authors:  B Deady; G Innes
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Biophysics of impact injury to the chest and abdomen.

Authors:  G J Cooper; D E Taylor
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.285

3.  Skin penetration assessment of less lethal kinetic energy munitions.

Authors:  Cynthia A Bir; Shelby J Stewart; Marianne Wilhelm
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 4.  Physiology and pathology of TASER electronic control devices.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 1.614

5.  An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices).

Authors:  James R Jauchem
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 1.832

6.  Non-fatal conductive energy device-related injuries treated in US emergency departments, 2005-2008.

Authors:  Tadesse Haileyesus; Joseph L Annest; James A Mercy
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  Casualty criteria for wounds from firearms with special reference to shot penetration. II.

Authors:  B N Mattoo; A K Wani; M D Asgekar
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.832

8.  Minimal velocities necessary for perforation of skin by air gun pellets and bullets.

Authors:  V J DiMaio; A R Copeland; P E Besant-Matthews; L A Fletcher; A Jones
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.832

9.  Perforating ocular injury by Taser.

Authors:  Sandy L Chen; Christen K Richard; Raghu C Murthy; Andreas K Lauer
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  An experimental model of sudden death due to low-energy chest-wall impact (commotio cordis)

Authors:  M S Link; P J Wang; N G Pandian; S Bharati; J E Udelson; M Y Lee; M A Vecchiotti; B A VanderBrink; G Mirra; B J Maron; N A Estes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.