Literature DB >> 21983860

Urban and non-urban disparities in the use of post-mastectomy radiation for breast cancer.

Steve R Martinez1, Warren H Tseng, Dhruvil R Shah, Robert J Canter, Richard J Bold.   

Abstract

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is indicated for local-regionally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We hypothesized that candidates for PMRT from non-urban areas would receive lower rates of RT than urban patients and would have poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify patients diagnosed with LABC and treated with mastectomy in Sacramento and its surrounding 13 counties between 2000 and 2006. All patients were eligible to receive RT according to established guidelines, with tumors >5 cm size, ≥ 4 metastatic lymph nodes, or both. According to a United States Department of Agriculture scale, we designated counties as urban or non-urban and used multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models to predict the use of RT, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Density of radiation oncologists in non-urban and urban counties was determined using the American Medical Association database in relation to census-derived populations of the respective counties. Entry criteria were met by 1,507 patients. Most (56.5%) were from urban counties; only 61% received RT. There was no radiation oncologist listed for 8/10 non-urban counties and 2/4 urban counties. Each radiation oncologist served 88,804 people in non-urban counties and 68,624 residents in urban counties. On multivariate analysis, non-urban patients (OR 0.56, CI 0.44-0.72) and increasing age were the only factors predicting a decreased likelihood of receiving RT (OR 0.97, CI 0.96-0.98). Patients not receiving PMRT experienced poorer OS (HR 1.77, CI 1.39-2.25; P < 0.001) and DSS (HR 1.62, CI 1.23-2.15; P = 0.001); however, non-urban status did not predict OS or DSS. Non-urban residents with LABC are less likely to receive indicated PMRT. This discrepancy may be due to limited RT access in non-urban areas. The lack of poorer OS and DSS due to this disparity requires further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21983860     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-0077-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  11 in total

1.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  A Recht; S B Edge; L J Solin; D S Robinson; A Estabrook; R E Fine; G F Fleming; S Formenti; C Hudis; J J Kirshner; D A Krause; R R Kuske; A S Langer; G W Sledge; T J Whelan; D G Pfister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Paul Abrahamse; Monica Morrow; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; John J Graff; Ann S Hamilton; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ragaz; S M Jackson; N Le; I H Plenderleith; J J Spinelli; V E Basco; K S Wilson; M A Knowling; C M Coppin; M Paradis; A J Coldman; I A Olivotto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum.

Authors:  Warren H Tseng; Thomas R Stevenson; Robert J Canter; Steven L Chen; Vijay P Khatri; Richard J Bold; Steve R Martinez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Disparities in the use of radiation therapy in patients with local-regionally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Steve R Martinez; Shannon H Beal; Steven L Chen; Robert J Canter; Vijay P Khatri; Allen Chen; Richard J Bold
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Rural physicians' understanding of the state-of-the-art in breast, colon and rectum cancer treatment.

Authors:  T A Hatzell; T C Ricketts; S E Tropman; E D Paskett; M R Cooper
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial.

Authors:  M Overgaard; P S Hansen; J Overgaard; C Rose; M Andersson; F Bach; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; H T Mouridsen; M B Jensen; K Zedeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Rural breast cancer treatment: evidence from the Reaching Communities for Cancer Care (REACH) project.

Authors:  S E Tropman; T C Ricketts; E Paskett; T A Hatzell; M R Cooper; T Aldrich
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Ya-Chen T Shih; Ying Xu; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; George H Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Factors associated with guideline-concordant use of radiotherapy after mastectomy in the national comprehensive cancer network.

Authors:  Rinaa S Punglia; Melissa E Hughes; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Michael A Bookman; John L Wilson; Rebecca A Ottesen; Joyce C Niland; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  Myxopapillary ependymoma: a SEER analysis of epidemiology and outcomes.

Authors:  James E Bates; Gyujae Choi; Michael T Milano
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Geographic variation in the intended choice of adjuvant treatments for women diagnosed with screen-detected breast cancer in Queensland.

Authors:  Jeff Ching-Fu Hsieh; Susanna M Cramb; James M McGree; Nathan A M Dunn; Peter D Baade; Kerrie L Mengersen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Consequences of Structural Urbanism: Urban-Rural Differences in Cancer Patients' Use and Perceived Importance of Supportive Care Services from a 2017-2018 Midwestern Survey.

Authors:  Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Patricia Fank; Michelle Gates; Kathy Robinson; Kristin Delfino; Zachary Paquin; Aaron T Seaman; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.