BACKGROUND: The risk of reoperation on the autograft and homograft is the major long-term drawback of the Ross procedure. The incidence and clinical implications of reoperations after the Ross procedure are reported. METHODS: Between March 1992 and February 2010, 336 consecutive patients had a Ross procedure (mean follow-up, 6.2±4.9 years). Autograft implant technique was freestanding root replacement in 269 patients, subcoronary implantation in 52 patients and a modified root replacement with the autograft included in a Valsalva tube graft in 15. RESULTS: Subsequently, 38 patients (11.3%) underwent reoperations, for autograft dilatation in 23 and a significant autograft insufficiency in 9, at 9.6±3.7 years and 2.6±3.9 years, respectively. Aortic and pulmonary infective endocarditis occurred in 3 patients. Three patients underwent a non valve-related cardiac reoperation. Three patients received a transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation after 12.2±1.7 years. At 15 years, freedoms for autograft and homograft explantation (with 95% confidence interval) were 83.3% (77.4%- to 9.2%) and 92.8% (87.6% to 97.9%), respectively. Native aortic valve regurgitation, indexed aortic annulus diameter exceeding 1.35 cm/m2 and autograft diameter were risk factors for dilated autograft reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 8.81], p=0.02; 3.83 [0.9 to 16.33], p=0.07 and 1.2 per mm [1.01 to 1.41], p=0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Autograft dilatation was the leading cause of reoperation in patients who underwent root replacement. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to determine whether modifications of the operative technique could limit autograft dilatation.
BACKGROUND: The risk of reoperation on the autograft and homograft is the major long-term drawback of the Ross procedure. The incidence and clinical implications of reoperations after the Ross procedure are reported. METHODS: Between March 1992 and February 2010, 336 consecutive patients had a Ross procedure (mean follow-up, 6.2±4.9 years). Autograft implant technique was freestanding root replacement in 269 patients, subcoronary implantation in 52 patients and a modified root replacement with the autograft included in a Valsalva tube graft in 15. RESULTS: Subsequently, 38 patients (11.3%) underwent reoperations, for autograft dilatation in 23 and a significant autograft insufficiency in 9, at 9.6±3.7 years and 2.6±3.9 years, respectively. Aortic and pulmonary infective endocarditis occurred in 3 patients. Three patients underwent a non valve-related cardiac reoperation. Three patients received a transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation after 12.2±1.7 years. At 15 years, freedoms for autograft and homograft explantation (with 95% confidence interval) were 83.3% (77.4%- to 9.2%) and 92.8% (87.6% to 97.9%), respectively. Native aortic valve regurgitation, indexed aortic annulus diameter exceeding 1.35 cm/m2 and autograft diameter were risk factors for dilated autograft reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 8.81], p=0.02; 3.83 [0.9 to 16.33], p=0.07 and 1.2 per mm [1.01 to 1.41], p=0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Autograft dilatation was the leading cause of reoperation in patients who underwent root replacement. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to determine whether modifications of the operative technique could limit autograft dilatation.
Authors: Sharman P Tan Tanny; Matthew S Yong; Yves d'Udekem; Remi Kowalski; Gavin Wheaton; Luigi D'Orsogna; John C Galati; Christian P Brizard; Igor E Konstantinov Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 5.501