Literature DB >> 21983055

Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Craig Lance1, Gordon McLennan, Nancy Obuchowski, Grace Cheah, Abraham Levitin, Mark Sands, James Spain, Shyam Srinivas, Sankaran Shrikanthan, Federico N Aucejo, Richard Kim, K V Narayanan Menon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare retrospectively the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization with the safety and efficacy of chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survival and complication rates were evaluated for patients with HCC who underwent chemoembolization or radioembolization at a single institution between August 2007 and April 2010. Complications were graded according to a standardized grading system for embolization procedures. Survival was determined via the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable analysis for factors affecting survival was performed.
RESULTS: This study included 73 patients with HCC who underwent index embolization with radioembolization (n = 38; 52.1%) or chemoembolization (n = 35; 47.9%). The two patient populations were similar in terms of demographics, etiology of cirrhosis, functional status, tumor characteristics, Child-Pugh class, previous liver-directed therapy, and number of patients with bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in survival between the radioembolization (median 8.0 months) and chemoembolization (median 10.3 months) cohorts (P = .33). Postembolization syndrome was significantly more severe in patients who underwent chemoembolization, which led to increased total hospitalization rates in these patients. The rates of other complications and rehospitalization were similar between groups. Increased age, Child-Pugh class B, hepatitis seropositivity, bilobar tumor distribution, tumor vascular invasion, and presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with reduced patient survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with radioembolization did not show a survival advantage over patients treated with chemoembolization. However, patients who underwent chemoembolization had significantly higher rates of hospitalization as a result of postembolization syndrome.
Copyright © 2011 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21983055     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  29 in total

Review 1.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Julien Edeline; Marine Gilabert; Etienne Garin; Eveline Boucher; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 2.  Current status of transarterial radioembolization.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 3.  Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: current role and future directions - the medical oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Jeanne Tie; Lourens Bester
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 4.  Current role of transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lourens Bester; Baerbel Meteling; David Boshell; Akshat Saxena; David L Morris
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 5.  Mental status changes postchemoembolization: the role of inflammatory response.

Authors:  Daniel Wells; Joseph Alisky; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Meta-analysis: adjusted indirect comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus 90Y-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Johannes M Ludwig; Di Zhang; Minzhi Xing; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Advances and Future Directions in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashil J Gosalia; Paul Martin; Patricia D Jones
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-07

Review 8.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical practice to evidence-based treatment protocols.

Authors:  Danijel Galun; Dragan Basaric; Marinko Zuvela; Predrag Bulajic; Aleksandar Bogdanovic; Nemanja Bidzic; Miroslav Milicevic
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-18

9.  Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura E Moreno-Luna; Ju Dong Yang; William Sanchez; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Denise M Harnois; Teresa A Mettler; Denise N Gansen; Piet C de Groen; Konstantinos N Lazaridis; K V Narayanan Menon; Nicholas F Larusso; Steven R Alberts; Gregory J Gores; Chad J Fleming; Seth W Slettedahl; William S Harmsen; Terry M Therneau; Gregory A Wiseman; James C Andrews; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.