Literature DB >> 21982930

Nothing to lose: processing blindness to potential losses drives thrill and adventure seekers.

Johann D Kruschwitz1, Alan N Simmons, Taru Flagan, Martin P Paulus.   

Abstract

Sensation seeking has been linked to increased risk taking and is therefore crucial in influencing behavioral outcomes of risk-taking behavior. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the neural underpinnings of risk appraisal were studied in a large subject sample (n=188), stratified according to thrill and adventure seeking (TAS) ratings. As defined by a median split of the sample, low and high TAS groups were compared on a simple decision-making task completed during fMRI. The task was designed such that risk (i.e., magnitude of outcome) and gains (i.e., direction of outcome) could be mapped independently. Behavioral analysis indicated that high TAS individuals are more sensitive to rewards but less discriminating between risk with and without punishment and that low TAS individuals are less sensitive to rewards but quite sensitive to receiving punishments in risky situations. Imaging results on the group differences for the interaction between level of risk and level of gain showed differences in the right superior frontal gyrus (BA6), left insula (BA21), right nucleus accumbens, left lentiform nucleus, and left precuneus (BA7). The presented data suggest a neural model of risk processing in sensation seeking individuals such that the positive response to reward outweighs the impact of equivalent loss. This imbalance in approach/avoidance is evident in differences in the underlying neural substrates in TAS individuals and leads to greater risk behavior in the face of potential loss.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982930      PMCID: PMC3256346          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  42 in total

1.  Prefrontal, parietal, and temporal cortex networks underlie decision-making in the presence of uncertainty.

Authors:  M P Paulus; N Hozack; B Zauscher; J E McDowell; L Frank; G G Brown; D L Braff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  M Botvinick; L E Nystrom; K Fissell; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Connections of the medial posterior parietal cortex (area 7m) in the monkey.

Authors:  G R Leichnetz
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2001-06-01

Review 5.  How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body.

Authors:  A D Craig
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Activation of the arousal response and impairment of performance increase with anxiety and stressor intensity.

Authors:  J T Noteboom; K R Barnholt; R M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-11

7.  Dopamine D2 receptors in the insular cortex and the personality trait of novelty seeking.

Authors:  T Suhara; F Yasuno; Y Sudo; M Yamamoto; M Inoue; Y Okubo; K Suzuki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.

Authors:  M Ullsperger; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Facundo Manes; Barbara Sahakian; Luke Clark; Robert Rogers; Nagui Antoun; Mike Aitken; Trevor Robbins
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The relationship between pathological gambling and sensation seeking: the role of subscale scores.

Authors:  Erica E Fortune; Adam S Goodie
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Attenuated insular processing during risk predicts relapse in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Joshua L Gowin; Katia M Harlé; Jennifer L Stewart; Marc Wittmann; Susan F Tapert; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Oxytocin tempers calculated greed but not impulsive defense in predator-prey contests.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; H Steven Scholte; Frans A A M van Winden; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  High sensation seeking is associated with behavioral and neural insensitivity to increased negative outcomes during decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Lijuan Luo; Zhiguo Xiao; Ke Zhao; Hua Wang; Cencen Wang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  High and low sensation seeking adolescents show distinct patterns of brain activity during reward processing.

Authors:  Anita Cservenka; Megan M Herting; Kristen L Mackiewicz Seghete; Karen A Hudson; Bonnie J Nagel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Quantifying Behavioral Sensation Seeking With the Aroma Choice Task.

Authors:  Brandon G Oberlin; Nolan E Ramer; Sage M Bates; Yitong I Shen; Jeremy S Myslinski; David A Kareken; Melissa A Cyders
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-07-27

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms regulating different forms of risk-related decision-making: Insights from animal models.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; David E Moorman; Jared W Young; Barry Setlow; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Risky decision-making and ventral striatal dopamine responses to amphetamine: a positron emission tomography [(11)C]raclopride study in healthy adults.

Authors:  Lynn M Oswald; Gary S Wand; Dean F Wong; Clayton H Brown; Hiroto Kuwabara; James R Brašić
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  High Thrill and adventure seeking is associated with reduced interoceptive sensitivity: evidence for an altered sex-specific homeostatic processing in high sensation seekers.

Authors:  J D Kruschwitz; U Lueken; A Wold; H Walter; M P Paulus
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2014-09

9.  Shared Neural Mechanisms for the Evaluation of Intense Sensory Stimulation and Economic Reward, Dependent on Stimulation-Seeking Behavior.

Authors:  Agnes Norbury; Vincent Valton; Geraint Rees; Jonathan P Roiser; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Deficits in voluntary pursuit and inhibition of risk taking in sensation seeking.

Authors:  Ya Zheng; Qi Li; Moqian Tian; Weizhi Nan; Guochun Yang; Jin Liang; Xun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.