Literature DB >> 21982833

Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a national survey of Canadian infectious diseases and critical care specialists.

Nick Daneman1, Kevin Shore, Ruxandra Pinto, Rob Fowler.   

Abstract

An optimum duration of antibiotic therapy would eradicate infection whilst minimising adverse drug reactions, resistance and costs. However, there is a paucity of evidence guiding the duration of therapy for bloodstream infections. Canadian infectious diseases (ID) and critical care specialists were surveyed regarding their recommended antibiotic treatment durations for five common bacteraemic syndromes. A descriptive analysis was performed to assess: (i) practice heterogeneity; (ii) equipoise for a trial of shorter versus longer therapy; and (iii) the influence of pathogen and host characteristics on recommendations. In total, 172 clinicians responded to the survey (60% ID, 39% critical care and 1% combined specialists). For each syndrome, the most common recommendation was 14 days, yet the majority of respondents recommended durations of ≤ 10 days. Median durations were similar for each syndrome: central vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection, 10 ± 3.6 days; bacteraemic pneumonia, 10 ± 2.8 days; bacteraemic urinary tract infection, 10 ± 3.8 days; bacteraemic intra-abdominal infection, 10 ± 4.1 days; and bacteraemic skin and soft-tissue infection, 14 ± 3.2 days. Respondents recommended the longest durations for Staphylococcus aureus and the shortest durations for coagulase-negative staphylococci. Most respondents would not modify duration based on host characteristics or measures of clinical response. ID physicians recommended longer durations than critical care physicians for all five syndromes, but the majority of both specialist groups would enrol patients in a trial of shorter (7 day) versus longer (14 day) antibiotic therapy. In conclusion, significant practice variation exists amongst clinicians' recommended durations of antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia. There is equipoise for a randomised trial comparing shorter versus longer courses of antibiotics for most bacteraemic syndromes and pathogens.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982833     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  16 in total

1.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Bacteremia Due to Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Giannoula S Tansarli; Nikolaos Andreatos; Elina E Pliakos; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Bloodstream infections in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi; Alessia Carnelutti
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.882

3.  Pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in critically ill patients with bloodstream infections: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Rachel D Savage; Robert A Fowler; Asgar H Rishu; Sean M Bagshaw; Deborah Cook; Peter Dodek; Richard Hall; Anand Kumar; François Lamontagne; François Lauzier; John Marshall; Claudio M Martin; Lauralyn McIntyre; John Muscedere; Steven Reynolds; Henry T Stelfox; Nick Daneman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Shorter Versus Longer Courses of Antibiotics for Infection in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Royer; Kimberley M DeMerle; Robert P Dickson; Hallie C Prescott
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Duration of antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with bloodstream infections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas C Havey; Robert A Fowler; Ruxandra Pinto; Marion Elligsen; Nick Daneman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 6.  Duration of antibiotic therapy for bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas C Havey; Robert A Fowler; Nick Daneman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Duration of antibiotic therapy in bacteraemia.

Authors:  Matt P Wise; Matt P G Morgan; Anton G Saayman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Bacteremia Antibiotic Length Actually Needed for Clinical Effectiveness (BALANCE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nick Daneman; Asgar H Rishu; Wei Xiong; Sean M Bagshaw; Deborah J Cook; Peter Dodek; Richard Hall; Anand Kumar; Francois Lamontagne; Francois Lauzier; John C Marshall; Claudio M Martin; Lauralyn McIntyre; John Muscedere; Steven Reynolds; Henry T Stelfox; Robert A Fowler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Treatment of bloodstream infections in ICUs.

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit; Jean-François Soubirou; Guillaume Voiriot; Sarah Chemam; Mathilde Neuville; Bruno Mourvillier; Romain Sonneville; Eric Mariotte; Lila Bouadma; Michel Wolff
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nick Daneman; Asgar H Rishu; Ruxandra Pinto; Pierre Aslanian; Sean M Bagshaw; Alex Carignan; Emmanuel Charbonney; Bryan Coburn; Deborah J Cook; Michael E Detsky; Peter Dodek; Richard Hall; Anand Kumar; Francois Lamontagne; Francois Lauzier; John C Marshall; Claudio M Martin; Lauralyn McIntyre; John Muscedere; Steven Reynolds; Wendy Sligl; Henry T Stelfox; M Elizabeth Wilcox; Robert A Fowler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.