Literature DB >> 21982760

Low lumbar burst fractures: a unique fracture mechanism sustained in our current overseas conflicts.

Ronald A Lehman1, Haines Paik, Tobin T Eckel, Melvin D Helgeson, Patrick B Cooper, Carlo Bellabarba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The most common location for burst fractures occurs at the thoracolumbar junction, where the stiff thoracic spine meets the more flexible lumbar spine. With our current military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, we have seen a disproportionate number of low lumbar burst fractures.
PURPOSE: To report our institutional experience in the management of low lumbar burst fractures. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records and radiographs for all patients treated at our institution with combat-related injuries and thoracolumbar fractures. We included all patients who had sustained a burst fracture from T12 to L5 and had at least 1-year clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients sustained burst fractures. Nineteen patients (59.4%) had low lumbar (L3-L5) burst fractures, and 12 patients (37.5%) had thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) burst fractures as their primary injury. Additionally, seven patients sustained less severe burst fractures at an additional level. One patient sustained burst fractures at both upper and lower lumbar levels. Of the low lumbar fractures, 52.6% had evidence of neurologic injury, two of which were complete. Similarly, in the upper lumbar group, 58.2% sustained a neurologic injury, two of which were complete. Twenty-two patients underwent surgical intervention, complicated by infection in 18%. At most recent follow-up, all but one patient with presenting neurologic injury had persistent deficits.
CONCLUSION: Low lumbar burst fractures are the predominant combat-related spine injury in our current military conflicts. The rigidity offered by current body armor may effectively lower the transition zone that normally occurs at the thoracolumbar junction, thereby, transferring forces into the lower lumbar spine. Increased awareness of this fracture pattern is warranted by all surgeons because of unique clinical challenges associated with its treatment. Although the incidence is increased in the military population, other surgeons may be involved with long-term care of these patients on completion of their military service. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982760     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  4 in total

1.  Gene-modified adult stem cells regenerate vertebral bone defect in a rat model.

Authors:  Dmitriy Sheyn; Ilan Kallai; Wafa Tawackoli; Doron Cohn Yakubovich; Anthony Oh; Susan Su; Xiaoyu Da; Amir Lavi; Nadav Kimelman-Bleich; Yoram Zilberman; Ning Li; Hyun Bae; Zulma Gazit; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Blast Injury in the Spine: Dynamic Response Index Is Not an Appropriate Model for Predicting Injury.

Authors:  Edward Spurrier; James A G Singleton; Spyros Masouros; Iain Gibb; Jon Clasper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Epidemiology of War-Related Spinal Cord Injury Among Combatants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Sivakumar Gulasingam; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 4.  Can a Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score Be Uniformly Applied from T1 to L5 or Are Modifications Necessary?

Authors:  Gregory D Schroeder; Christopher K Kepler; John D Koerner; F Cumhur Oner; Michael G Fehlings; Bizhan Aarabi; Klaus J Schnake; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Frank Kandziora; Luiz R Vialle; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.