BACKGROUND: Registries have shown that quality of care for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often falls below the standards recommended in professional guidelines. Quality improvement (QI) is a strategy to improve standards of clinical care for patients, but the efficacy of QI for ACS has not been tested in randomized trials. METHODS: We undertook a prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy of a QI program for ACS. Participating centers collected data on consecutive admissions for non-ST-elevation ACS for 4 months before the QI intervention and 3 months after. Thirty-eight hospitals in France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom were randomized to receive the QI program or not, 19 in each group. We measured 8 in-hospital quality indicators (risk stratification, coronary angiography, anticoagulation, β-blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and clopidogrel loading and maintenance) before and after the intervention and compared composite changes between the QI and non-QI groups. RESULTS: A total of 2604 patients were enrolled. The absolute overall change in use of quality indicators in the QI group was 8.5% compared with 0.8% in the non-QI group (odds ratio for achieving a quality indicator in QI versus non-QI 1.66, 95% CI 1.43-1.94; P < .001). The main changes were observed in the use of risk stratification and clopidogrel loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: The QI strategy resulted in a significant improvement in the quality indicators measured. This type of QI intervention can lead to useful changes in health care practice for ACS in a wide range of settings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Registries have shown that quality of care for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often falls below the standards recommended in professional guidelines. Quality improvement (QI) is a strategy to improve standards of clinical care for patients, but the efficacy of QI for ACS has not been tested in randomized trials. METHODS: We undertook a prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy of a QI program for ACS. Participating centers collected data on consecutive admissions for non-ST-elevation ACS for 4 months before the QI intervention and 3 months after. Thirty-eight hospitals in France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom were randomized to receive the QI program or not, 19 in each group. We measured 8 in-hospital quality indicators (risk stratification, coronary angiography, anticoagulation, β-blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and clopidogrel loading and maintenance) before and after the intervention and compared composite changes between the QI and non-QI groups. RESULTS: A total of 2604 patients were enrolled. The absolute overall change in use of quality indicators in the QI group was 8.5% compared with 0.8% in the non-QI group (odds ratio for achieving a quality indicator in QI versus non-QI 1.66, 95% CI 1.43-1.94; P < .001). The main changes were observed in the use of risk stratification and clopidogrel loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: The QI strategy resulted in a significant improvement in the quality indicators measured. This type of QI intervention can lead to useful changes in health care practice for ACS in a wide range of settings.
Authors: Ehete Bahiru; Anubha Agarwal; Mark A Berendsen; Abigail S Baldridge; Tecla Temu; Amy Rogers; Carey Farquhar; Frederick Bukachi; Mark D Huffman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2019-09-06
Authors: Thang Nguyen; Hoa Q Nguyen; Niken N Widyakusuma; Thao H Nguyen; Tam T Pham; Katja Taxis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Monique Anderson Starks; Gillian D Sanders; Remy Rene Coeytaux; Isaretta L Riley; Larry R Jackson; Amanda McBroom Brooks; Kevin L Thomas; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Robert M Califf; Adrian F Hernandez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aida Ribera; Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez; Josep Ramon Marsal; Gerard Oristrell; Maria Teresa Faixedas; Alba Rosas; Helena Tizón-Marcos; Sergio Rojas; Carlos Labata; Merida Cardenas; Silvia Homs; Carlos Tomas-Querol; Joan Garcia-Picart; Joan A Gomez-Hospital; Jose Ignacio Pijoan; Monica Masotti; Josepa Mauri; David Garcia Dorado Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Josien Engel; Marie-Julie Heeren; Ineke van der Wulp; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Edward S Lee; Rajesh Vedanthan; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Jemima H Kamano; Preeti Kudesia; Vikram Rajan; Michael Engelgau; Andrew E Moran Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 3.240