Literature DB >> 21982663

Cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a quality improvement program on management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The European Quality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndromes (EQUIP-ACS).

Marcus D Flather1, Daphne Babalis, Jean Booth, Alfredo Bardaji, Jacques Machecourt, Grzegorz Opolski, Filippo Ottani, Héctor Bueno, Winston Banya, Anthony R Brady, Mats Bojestig, Bertil Lindahl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Registries have shown that quality of care for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often falls below the standards recommended in professional guidelines. Quality improvement (QI) is a strategy to improve standards of clinical care for patients, but the efficacy of QI for ACS has not been tested in randomized trials.
METHODS: We undertook a prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy of a QI program for ACS. Participating centers collected data on consecutive admissions for non-ST-elevation ACS for 4 months before the QI intervention and 3 months after. Thirty-eight hospitals in France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom were randomized to receive the QI program or not, 19 in each group. We measured 8 in-hospital quality indicators (risk stratification, coronary angiography, anticoagulation, β-blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and clopidogrel loading and maintenance) before and after the intervention and compared composite changes between the QI and non-QI groups.
RESULTS: A total of 2604 patients were enrolled. The absolute overall change in use of quality indicators in the QI group was 8.5% compared with 0.8% in the non-QI group (odds ratio for achieving a quality indicator in QI versus non-QI 1.66, 95% CI 1.43-1.94; P < .001). The main changes were observed in the use of risk stratification and clopidogrel loading dose.
CONCLUSIONS: The QI strategy resulted in a significant improvement in the quality indicators measured. This type of QI intervention can lead to useful changes in health care practice for ACS in a wide range of settings.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982663     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  12 in total

1.  Effect of a Quality of Care Improvement Initiative in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in Resource-Constrained Hospitals in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yangfeng Wu; Shenshen Li; Anushka Patel; Xian Li; Xin Du; Tao Wu; Yifei Zhao; Lin Feng; Laurent Billot; Eric D Peterson; Mark Woodward; Lingzhi Kong; Yong Huo; Dayi Hu; Kalipso Chalkidou; Runlin Gao
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Hospital-Based Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ehete Bahiru; Anubha Agarwal; Mark A Berendsen; Abigail S Baldridge; Tecla Temu; Amy Rogers; Carey Farquhar; Frederick Bukachi; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-09-06

3.  Orthopedic registry research - limitations and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 4.  Adherence to Cardiac Practice Guidelines in the Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Josien Engel; Nikki L Damen; Ineke van der Wulp; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Enhancing prescribing of guideline-recommended medications for ischaemic heart diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions targeted at healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Thang Nguyen; Hoa Q Nguyen; Niken N Widyakusuma; Thao H Nguyen; Tam T Pham; Katja Taxis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Uppsala Clinical Research Center-development of a platform to promote national and international clinical science.

Authors:  Lars Wallentin; Bertil Lindahl
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review.

Authors:  Monique Anderson Starks; Gillian D Sanders; Remy Rene Coeytaux; Isaretta L Riley; Larry R Jackson; Amanda McBroom Brooks; Kevin L Thomas; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Robert M Califf; Adrian F Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Persistence with dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a population-based cohort study in Catalonia (Spain).

Authors:  Aida Ribera; Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez; Josep Ramon Marsal; Gerard Oristrell; Maria Teresa Faixedas; Alba Rosas; Helena Tizón-Marcos; Sergio Rojas; Carlos Labata; Merida Cardenas; Silvia Homs; Carlos Tomas-Querol; Joan Garcia-Picart; Joan A Gomez-Hospital; Jose Ignacio Pijoan; Monica Masotti; Josepa Mauri; David Garcia Dorado
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Understanding factors that influence the use of risk scoring instruments in the management of patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Netherlands: a qualitative study of health care practitioners' perceptions.

Authors:  Josien Engel; Marie-Julie Heeren; Ineke van der Wulp; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Quality Improvement for Cardiovascular Disease Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Edward S Lee; Rajesh Vedanthan; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Jemima H Kamano; Preeti Kudesia; Vikram Rajan; Michael Engelgau; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.