Literature DB >> 21982562

The outpatient institutional antibiogram does not accurately reflect the susceptibility of prepartum group B streptococcal isolates to erythromycin and clindamycin.

Katharine L Gray1, Letitia C Fulcher, M Leticia McElmeel, Elly Marie-Jeaanne Xenakis, James H Jorgensen.   

Abstract

This study compared the antimicrobial susceptibilities of 100 nonduplicate group B streptococcal (GBS) isolates from screening cultures of women attending OB-GYN clinics to a similar number of outpatient infection isolates recorded on the institutional antibiogram of a university teaching hospital. The screening GBS isolates were significantly more susceptible to erythromycin (72% versus 45%) and clindamycin (77% versus 48%) than the infection isolates.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982562     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  1 in total

Review 1.  Developmental roadmap for antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems.

Authors:  Alex van Belkum; Till T Bachmann; Gerd Lüdke; Jan Gorm Lisby; Gunnar Kahlmeter; Allan Mohess; Karsten Becker; John P Hays; Neil Woodford; Konstantinos Mitsakakis; Jacob Moran-Gilad; Jordi Vila; Harald Peter; John H Rex; Wm Michael Dunne
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 60.633

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.