Literature DB >> 21981675

Electrophysiologically dissociating episodic preretrieval processing.

Emma K Bridger1, Axel Mecklinger.   

Abstract

Contrasts between ERPs elicited by new items from tests with distinct episodic retrieval requirements index preretrieval processing. Preretrieval operations are thought to facilitate the recovery of task-relevant information because they have been shown to correlate with response accuracy in tasks in which prioritizing the retrieval of this information could be a useful strategy. This claim was tested here by contrasting new item ERPs from two retrieval tasks, each designed to explicitly require the recovery of a different kind of mnemonic information. New item ERPs differed from 400 msec poststimulus, but the distribution of these effects varied markedly, depending upon participants' response accuracy: A protracted posteriorly located effect was present for higher performing participants, whereas an anteriorly distributed effect occurred for lower performing participants. The magnitude of the posterior effect from 400 to 800 msec correlated with response accuracy, supporting the claim that preretrieval processes facilitate the recovery of task-relevant information. Additional contrasts between ERPs from these tasks and an old/new recognition task operating as a relative baseline revealed task-specific effects with nonoverlapping scalp topographies, in line with the assumption that these new item ERP effects reflect qualitatively distinct retrieval operations. Similarities in these effects were also used to reason about preretrieval processes related to the general requirement to recover contextual details. These insights, alongside the distinct pattern of effects for the two accuracy groups, reveal the multifarious nature of preretrieval processing while indicating that only some of these classes of operation are systematically related to response accuracy in recognition memory tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21981675     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Monetary rewards influence retrieval orientations.

Authors:  Teresa M Halsband; Nicola K Ferdinand; Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The costs of target prioritization and the external requirements for using a recall-to-reject strategy in memory exclusion tasks: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Top-down constraint on recognition memory.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

4.  The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.

Authors:  Chuanji Gao; Timm Rosburg; Mingzhu Hou; Bingbing Li; Xin Xiao; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval.

Authors:  Jane E Herron; Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Aging, working memory capacity and the proactive control of recollection: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Jessica Keating; Caitlin Affleck-Brodie; Ronny Wiegand; Alexa M Morcom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Direct electrophysiological evidence for the maintenance of retrieval orientations and the role of cognitive control.

Authors:  Jane E Herron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cognitive control depletion reduces pre-stimulus and recollection-related measures of strategic retrieval.

Authors:  Jane E Herron
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2019-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.