| Literature DB >> 21980320 |
Ayse Arslan1, Sevim Orkun, Gülümser Aydin, Isik Keles, Aliye Tosun, Mustafa Arslan, Osman Caglayan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of ovariectomy on bone mineral density (BMD) and oxidative state in rats, and the alterations in these effects that vitamin C supplementation may produce.Entities:
Keywords: ascorbic; osteoporosis; ovariectomy; oxidative stress; rat; vitamin C
Year: 2011 PMID: 21980320 PMCID: PMC3188298 DOI: 10.3402/ljm.v6i0.5965
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Libyan J Med ISSN: 1819-6357 Impact factor: 1.657
Comparison of body weights at the beginning and end of treatment period
| Weight (g) | C ( | O ( | OV ( | C-O ( | C-OV ( | O-OV ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning | 182.5±6.7 (177–195) | 183.7±10.5 (175–203) | 182.5±7.3 (175–194) | 0.960 | 0.829 | 0.829 | 0.846 |
| End | 206.7±5.1 (200–210) | 214.3±12.7 (200–230) | 199.3±11.7 (175–210) | 0.092 | 0.285 | 0.153 | 0.051 |
C: Control, O: Ovariectomy, OV: Ovariectomy +vitamin C
Mean±SD: Mean± standard deviation, min–max: minimum–maximum
Statistical significance was set at p< 0.05 with Kruskal–Wallis test
Statistical significance was set at p< 0.033 with Bonferroni-adjusted Mann–Whitney U test
Comparison of bone mineral densities
| C ( | O ( | OV ( | C-O ( | C-OV ( | O-OV ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertebrae (g/cm2) | 0.120±0.007 (0.116–0.133) | 0.113±0.003 (0.109–0.118) | 0.121±0.004 (0.114–0.125) | 0.253 |
C: Control, O: Ovariectomy, OV: Ovariectomy +vitamin C
Mean±SD: Mean± standard deviation, min–max: minimum–maximum
Statistical significance was set at p< 0.05 with Kruskal–Wallis test
Statistical significance was set at p< 0.033 with Bonferroni-adjusted Mann–Whitney U test
Fig. 1Bone mineral density of lumbar vertebrae.
Oxidative stress parameters in femur bone tissue
| C ( | O ( | OV ( | C-O ( | C-OV ( | O-OV ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA (nM/mg prt) | 12.85±6.01 (3.58–20.76) | 24.21±10.21 (5.35–35.27) | 12.63±3.56 (8.55–18.58) | 0.775 | |||
| t-SH (?M/g prt) | 113.33±57.14 (40–212) | 76.0±42.06 (24–140) | 96.0±42.45 (58–187) | 0.336 | 0.199 | 0.250 | 0.562 |
| NO (?M/g prt) | 8.32±1.75 (5.19–9.9) | 16.03±6.73 (7.04–26.36) | 8.78±1.69 (6.24–11.24) | 0.668 | |||
| SOD (U/mg prt) | 2.28±0.57 (1.5–2.78) | 3.85±1.25 (2.44–5.88) | 2.50±0.44 (1.55–2.92) | 0.668 | 0.048 | ||
| CAT (nM/min/mg prt) | 40.83±5.10 (35.9–49.3) | 38.34±14.78 (21.4–65.3) | 36.26±9.79 (19.7–52.4) | 0.448 | 0.390 | 0.253 | 0.749 |
| GPx (U/g prt) | 16.25±4.35 (12.15–24.02) | 17.85±6.01 (12.84–29.86) | 14.80±2.82 (11.87–20.31) | 0.490 | 0.668 | 0.475 | 0.225 |
C: Control, O: Ovariectomy, OV: Ovariectomy +vitamin C
Mean±SD: Mean± standard deviation, min–max: minimum–maximum
Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 with Kruskal–Wallis test
Statistical significance was set at p<0.033 with Bonferroni-adjusted Mann–Whitney U test
Plasma oxidant stress parameters
| C ( | O ( | OV ( | C-O ( | C-OV ( | O-OV ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA (nM/ml) | 9.28±3.36 (6.61–15.9) | 14.37±3.81 (10.83–20.96) | 11.88±3.36 (7.24–16.53) | 0.086 | 0.277 | ||
| t-SH (nM/ml) | 0.42±0.09 (0.28–0.56) | 0.44±0.13 (0.21–0.63) | 0.38±0.12 (0.23–0.58) | 0.608 | 0.668 | 0.568 | 0.338 |
| NO (nM/ml) | 46.75±6.28 (41.9–56.5) | 82.90±30.62 (41.9–123.5) | 47.01±6.33 (37.7–55.8) | 0.774 | |||
| SOD (U/ml) | 0.53±0.08 (0.44–0.63) | 0.70±0.18 (0.56–1.08) | 0.59±0.14 (0.45–0.84) | 0.105 | 0.032 | 0.390 | 0.250 |
| CAT (nM/min/ml) | 57.5±10.3 (39.2–70.1) | 63.8±12.2 (42.8–76.1) | 61.13±8.23 (53.2–76.1) | 0.511 | 0.199 | 0.886 | 0.522 |
| GPx (U/L) | 2.61±0.70 (1.46–3.28) | 3.45±0.73 (2.71–4.93) | 2.57±1.29 (0.57–4.02) | 0.217 | 0.073 | 0.830 | 0.249 |
C: Control, O: Ovariectomy, OV: Ovariectomy +vitamin C
Mean±SD: Mean± standard deviation, min–max: minimum–maximum
Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 with Kruskal–Wallis test
Statistical significance was set at p<0.033 with Bonferroni-adjusted Mann–Whitney U test