PREMISE OF STUDY: The legume genus Vigna and close relatives have highly elaborated floral morphologies that involve the coiling, bending, and intricate connection of flower parts. Banners, levers, platforms, and pumps have evolved that attract pollinators and then manipulate their movement. Given this three-dimensional floral complexity, the taxonomy of Vigna and relatives has been confounded by the study of mostly two-dimensional museum specimens. A molecular phylogenetic analysis was undertaken in the effort to resolve long-standing taxonomic questions centered on floral morphology. METHODS: The phylogenetic analysis included cpDNA trnK and nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8S (ITS) sequence variation. The American species were comprehensively sampled and outgroups included Old World relatives. KEY RESULTS: The trnK and ITS data analyses concurred in resolving six well-supported clades of American Vigna that are most closely related to other American genera: Dolichopsis, Macroptilium, Mysanthus, Oryxis, Oxyrhynchus, Phaseolus, Ramirezella, and Strophostyles. These 14 American clades ranked here as genera are resolved as sister to a clade comprising the mainly Old World species of Vigna. CONCLUSIONS: American Vigna clades were reassigned to the genera Ancistrotropis, Cochliasanthus, Condylostylis, Leptospron, Sigmoidotropis, and the newly described Helicotropis. Vigna sensu stricto in the Americas now includes relatively few and mostly pantropical species. Elaborate floral asymmetries are readily used to apomorphically diagnose nearly all of the American genera. The age estimates of the extant diversification of the American and its Old World sister clade are approximately coeval at ca. 6-7 million yr, which belies much greater floral variation in the Americas.
PREMISE OF STUDY: The legume genus Vigna and close relatives have highly elaborated floral morphologies that involve the coiling, bending, and intricate connection of flower parts. Banners, levers, platforms, and pumps have evolved that attract pollinators and then manipulate their movement. Given this three-dimensional floral complexity, the taxonomy of Vigna and relatives has been confounded by the study of mostly two-dimensional museum specimens. A molecular phylogenetic analysis was undertaken in the effort to resolve long-standing taxonomic questions centered on floral morphology. METHODS: The phylogenetic analysis included cpDNA trnK and nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8S (ITS) sequence variation. The American species were comprehensively sampled and outgroups included Old World relatives. KEY RESULTS: The trnK and ITS data analyses concurred in resolving six well-supported clades of American Vigna that are most closely related to other American genera: Dolichopsis, Macroptilium, Mysanthus, Oryxis, Oxyrhynchus, Phaseolus, Ramirezella, and Strophostyles. These 14 American clades ranked here as genera are resolved as sister to a clade comprising the mainly Old World species of Vigna. CONCLUSIONS: American Vigna clades were reassigned to the genera Ancistrotropis, Cochliasanthus, Condylostylis, Leptospron, Sigmoidotropis, and the newly described Helicotropis. Vigna sensu stricto in the Americas now includes relatively few and mostly pantropical species. Elaborate floral asymmetries are readily used to apomorphically diagnose nearly all of the American genera. The age estimates of the extant diversification of the American and its Old World sister clade are approximately coeval at ca. 6-7 million yr, which belies much greater floral variation in the Americas.
Authors: Emanuelle Varão Vasconcelos; Artur Fellipe de Andrade Fonsêca; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Kyria Cilene de Andrade Bortoleti; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Antônio Félix da Costa; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.239
Authors: Edeline Gagnon; Anne Bruneau; Colin E Hughes; Luciano Paganucci de Queiroz; Gwilym P Lewis Journal: PhytoKeys Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 1.635
Authors: Ana Rafaela da S Oliveira; Lívia do Vale Martins; Fernanda de O Bustamante; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Timothy Close; Antônio F da Costa; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 5.239
Authors: Lívia do Vale Martins; Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante; Ana Rafaela da Silva Oliveira; Antônio Félix da Costa; Lidiane de Lima Feitoza; Qihua Liang; Hainan Zhao; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Jiming Jiang; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal Journal: Chromosoma Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 4.316
Authors: Matías Morales; Luis Oakley; Angela L B Sartori; Virginia Y Mogni; Margoth Atahuachi; Ricardo O Vanni; Renée H Fortunato; Darién E Prado Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240