Literature DB >> 21979855

An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream.

Paul Silverstein1, David Heimbach, Herbert Meites, Barbara Latenser, David Mozingo, Fred Mullins, Warren Garner, Joseph Turkowski, Jeffrey Shupp, Paul Glat, Gary Purdue.   

Abstract

An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study was implemented to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (Mepilex Ag) vs silver sulfadiazine cream (control) in the treatment of partial-thickness thermal burns. Individuals aged 5 years and older with partial-thickness thermal burns (2.5-20% BSA) were randomized into two groups and treated with the trial products for 21 days or until healed, whichever occurred first. Data were obtained and analyzed on cost (direct and indirect), healing rates, pain, comfort, ease of product use, and adverse events. A total of 101 subjects were recruited. There were no significant differences in burn area profiles within the groups. The cost of dressing-related analgesia was lower in the intervention group (P = .03) as was the cost of background analgesia (P = .07). The mean total cost of treatment was $309 vs $513 in the control (P < .001). The average cost-effectiveness per treatment regime was $381 lower in the intervention product, producing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1688 in favor of the soft silicone foam dressing. Mean healing rates were 71.7 vs 60.8% at final visit, and the number of dressing changes were 2.2 vs 12.4 in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Subjects reported significantly less pain at application (P = .02) and during wear (P = .048) of the Mepilex Ag dressing in the acute stages of wound healing. Clinicians reported the intervention dressing was significantly easier to use (P = .03) and flexible (P = .04). Both treatments were well tolerated; however, the total incidence of adverse events was higher in the control group. The silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing was as effective in the treatment of patients as the standard care (silver sulfadiazine). In addition, the group of patients treated with the soft silicone foam dressing demonstrated decreased pain and lower costs associated with treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21979855     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318236fe31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  20 in total

Review 1.  Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Steven-Johnson Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Olivia A Charlton; Victoria Harris; Kevin Phan; Erin Mewton; Chris Jackson; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Management of Traumatic Wounds and a Novel Approach to Delivering Wound Care in Children.

Authors:  Kathryn Q Bernabe; Thomas J Desmarais; Martin S Keller
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Antiseptics for burns.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Janice Christie; Zhenmi Liu; Maggie J Westby; Jayne M Jefferies; Thomas Hudson; Jacky Edwards; Devi Prasad Mohapatra; Ibrahim A Hassan; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 4.  Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns.

Authors:  Jason Wasiak; Heather Cleland; Fiona Campbell; Anneliese Spinks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

5.  A randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone-coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds.

Authors:  Franck David; Jean-Louis Wurtz; Nicolas Breton; Olivier Bisch; Philippe Gazeu; Jean-Charles Kerihuel; Odile Guibon
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Pediatric hand injuries: Practical approach for primary care physicians.

Authors:  George Wahba; Kevin Cheung
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Inpatient silver sulphadiazine versus outpatient nanocrystalline silver models of care for pediatric scald burns: A value analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Malic; Cynthia Verchere; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

8.  Estimating the cost impact of dressing choice in the context of a mass burns casualty event.

Authors:  J Lowin; T Winfield; P Price; P Anderson; T Potokar
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2019-09-30

9.  The effect and safety of dressing composed by nylon threads covered with metallic silver in wound treatment.

Authors:  Ariane R Brogliato; Paula A Borges; Janaina F Barros; Manuela Lanzetti; Samuel Valença; Nesser C Oliveira; Hélcio J Izário-Filho; Claudia F Benjamim
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  Use of silver in the prevention and treatment of infections: silver review.

Authors:  Amani D Politano; Kristin T Campbell; Laura H Rosenberger; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.