Literature DB >> 21979532

Risk communication, radiation, and radiological emergencies: strategies, tools, and techniques.

Vincent T Covello1.   

Abstract

Risk communication is the two-way exchange of information about risks, including risks associated with radiation and radiological events. The risk communication literature contains a broad range of strategies for overcoming the psychological, sociological, and cultural factors that create public misperceptions and misunderstandings about risks. These strategies help radiation risk communicators overcome the challenges posed by three basic observations about people under stress: (1) people under stress typically want to know that you care before they care about what you know; (2) people under stress typically have difficulty hearing, understanding, and remembering information; (3) people under stress typically focus more on negative information than positive information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21979532     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182299549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  10 in total

1.  Citizens' Communication Needs and Attitudes to Risk in a Nuclear Accident Scenario: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Joel Rasmussen; Mats Eriksson; Johan Martinsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Gadolinium retention: should pediatric radiologists be concerned, and how to frame conversations with families.

Authors:  Sakura M Noda; Murat Alp Oztek; A Luana Stanescu; Ezekiel Maloney; Dennis W W Shaw; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  The importance of trustworthy sources of scientific information in risk communication with the public.

Authors:  Malcolm J Crick
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  The Radiation Problem and Its Solution from a Health Communication Perspective.

Authors:  Yungwook Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Relationships Among Tweets Related to Radiation: Visualization Using Co-Occurring Networks.

Authors:  Ayako Yagahara; Keiri Hanai; Shin Hasegawa; Katsuhiko Ogasawara
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2018-03-15

6.  Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile Educator Tool for Pediatric Diabetes Self-Management: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marisa Otis; Jack Zhu; Suleiman N Mustafa-Kutana; Angelina V Bernier; Julio Ma Shum; Arlette A Soros Dupre; Monica L Wang
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2020-05-01

7.  Adherence of Internet-Based Cancer Risk Assessment Tools to Best Practices in Risk Communication: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jeremy L Foust; Laura D Scherer; Amy McQueen; Jennifer M Taber
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The Effect of Risk Communication on Public Behavior to Non-Conventional Terrorism-Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Moran Bodas; Morel Ragoler; Yossi Rabby; Esther Krasner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Communication of radiation risk in nuclear medicine: Are we saying the right thing?

Authors:  Manish Pandit; Sobhan Vinjamuri
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-07

10.  Quality of Life and Intention to Return among Former Residents of Tomioka Town, Fukushima Prefecture 9 Years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident.

Authors:  Makiko Orita; Yasuyuki Taira; Hitomi Matsunaga; Masaharu Maeda; Noboru Takamura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.