Sang W Lee1, Jeffrey W Milsom, Garrett M Nash. 1. New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. sal2013@med.cornell.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New technology for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy is now commercially available, yet advantages of this approach over multiport laparoscopic colectomy have not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent single-incision vs multiport laparoscopic colectomies. DESIGN: Consecutive patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic colectomies were case matched to patients who underwent multiport laparoscopic colectomies by age, operation, surgeon, diagnosis, and body mass index. Data from a prospective database and the medical records of patients treated were reviewed. SETTINGS: This study took place at 2 tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: Forty-six consecutive patients with a body mass index of 24 underwent single-incision laparoscopic colectomies (24 right, 18 sigmoid, 4 low anterior resection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative outcomes and cosmesis and body image scores at 90 days were compared. RESULTS: The largest incision length was significantly shorter for the single-incision group. Two patients with single incisions were converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and 4 required placement of a 5-mm trocar. A significantly greater portion of the operation was performed by the attending surgeons in the single-incision group. For right colectomies, operative times were similar. For left colectomies, operative time (149 ± 30 vs 126 ± 21 min) was significantly longer for the single-incision group. Time to flatus and bowel movements were significantly shorter for the single-incision group, but length of stay was similar. Cosmetic score was higher for the single-incision group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Single incision is equivalent to multiport laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and efficacy with smaller incision size and higher cosmetic scores. Operative times were equivalent, although a greater portion of the operation was performed by the attending surgeons in the single-incision group. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy.
BACKGROUND: New technology for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy is now commercially available, yet advantages of this approach over multiport laparoscopic colectomy have not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent single-incision vs multiport laparoscopic colectomies. DESIGN: Consecutive patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic colectomies were case matched to patients who underwent multiport laparoscopic colectomies by age, operation, surgeon, diagnosis, and body mass index. Data from a prospective database and the medical records of patients treated were reviewed. SETTINGS: This study took place at 2 tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: Forty-six consecutive patients with a body mass index of 24 underwent single-incision laparoscopic colectomies (24 right, 18 sigmoid, 4 low anterior resection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative outcomes and cosmesis and body image scores at 90 days were compared. RESULTS: The largest incision length was significantly shorter for the single-incision group. Two patients with single incisions were converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and 4 required placement of a 5-mm trocar. A significantly greater portion of the operation was performed by the attending surgeons in the single-incision group. For right colectomies, operative times were similar. For left colectomies, operative time (149 ± 30 vs 126 ± 21 min) was significantly longer for the single-incision group. Time to flatus and bowel movements were significantly shorter for the single-incision group, but length of stay was similar. Cosmetic score was higher for the single-incision group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Single incision is equivalent to multiport laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and efficacy with smaller incision size and higher cosmetic scores. Operative times were equivalent, although a greater portion of the operation was performed by the attending surgeons in the single-incision group. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy.
Authors: John H Marks; Grace A Montenegro; Margaret V Shields; Joseph L Frenkel; Gerald J Marks Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 4.584