Literature DB >> 21978915

An enhanced and validated generic thoraco-lumbar spine model for prediction of muscle forces.

Kap-Soo Han1, Thomas Zander, William R Taylor, Antonius Rohlmann.   

Abstract

A direct measurement of the complete loads in the spine continues to remain elusive. Analytical musculoskeletal models to predict the internal loading conditions generally neglect or strongly simplify passive soft tissue structures. However, during large intervertebral motions, passive structures such as ligaments and the stiffness of the intervertebral discs are thought to play a critical role on the muscle forces required for equilibrium. The objective of the present study was to add the short segmental muscles, lumbar ligaments and disc stiffnesses to an existing base musculoskeletal model of the spine in order to establish what role passive soft tissue structures play in spinal loading, but also validate these results against experimentally determined load data. The long trunk muscles not included in previous models, short segmental muscles, lumbar ligaments and disc stiffnesses were implemented into a commercially available musculoskeletal spine model construct. For several activities of daily living, the loads acting on the vertebral bodies were then calculated relative to the value for standing, and then compared to the corresponding values measured in vivo. Good agreement between calculated and measured results could be achieved in all cases, with a maximum difference of 9%. The highest muscle forces were predicted in the m. longissimus (146N) for flexion, in the m. rectus abdominis (363N) for extension, and in the m. psoas major (144N and 81N) for lateral bending and axial rotation. This study has demonstrated that the inclusion of the complete set of muscle and ligament structures into musculoskeletal models of the spine is essential before accurate spinal forces can be determined. For the first time, trend validation of spinal loading has been achieved, thus allowing confidence in the precise prediction of muscle forces for a range of activities of daily living.
Copyright © 2011 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978915     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  17 in total

1.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 3.  Mechanical loading of the intervertebral disc: from the macroscopic to the cellular level.

Authors:  Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Fabio Galbusera; Harris Pratsinis; Eleni Mavrogonatou; Antje Mietsch; Dimitris Kletsas; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development and Validation of a Musculoskeletal Model of the Fully Articulated Thoracolumbar Spine and Rib Cage.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  The effect of muscle ageing and sarcopenia on spinal segmental loads.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Waldo Valenzuela; Mauricio Reyes; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine influences vertebral loading predictions.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Brett T Allaire; Kelsey R Velie; M Clara De Paolis Kaluza; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Spinal Loading Patterns From Biomechanical Modeling Explain the High Incidence of Vertebral Fractures in the Thoracolumbar Region.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Katelyn Burkhart; Brett Allaire; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Biomechanical Properties of Paraspinal Muscles Influence Spinal Loading-A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; C Antonio Sanchez; Stephen H M Brown; John Street; Sidney Fels; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

10.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.