Literature DB >> 2197858

The peritoneovenous shunt: expectations and reality.

M Moskovitz1.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the LeVeen modification of the peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) in 1974, these devices have been placed in a relatively large number of patients. The most common indication has been for medically intractable ascites in the setting of chronic liver disease. A review of a series of studies shows that we can expect approximately an 18% perioperative overall mortality rate, a 46% survival rate at 21 months, and loss of ascites in 59% of the survivors at 18 months. The PVS has not been shown by prospective trials to prolong survival significantly in patients with either intractable ascites or the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), although it may shorten hospitalizations, compared with medical controls. A few well-documented cases of reversal of the HRS have been documented. The best results of PVS therapy have been evident in those patients with milder liver disease. The loss of ascites need not correlate with a functioning shunt. Alcohol abstinance is associated with hepatic functional recovery and may relate to the disappearance of renal sodium retention, resulting in shunt occlusion due to low flow. A number of serious complications with the PVS have been described. Nutritional repletion follows successful shunting, but might, in part, relate to simultaneous alcohol abstention. The more common complications of coagulopathy and fluid overload are preventable by total ascitic drainage at the time of surgery. Shunt patency remains a clinical problem. Only 18.6% of the total shunts placed functioned in the survivors at 2 yr. Perioperative infections with staphylococcal and Gram-negative organisms occur. Postoperative bacterial peritonitis or septicemia requires shunt removal for cure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2197858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  6 in total

1.  TIPS versus peritoneovenous shunt in the treatment of medically intractable ascites: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Alexander S Rosemurgy; Emmanuel E Zervos; Whalen C Clark; Donald P Thometz; Thomas J Black; Bruce R Zwiebel; Bruce T Kudryk; L Shane Grundy; Larry C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Venous-right atrial bypass for superior vena cava thrombosis during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  A D Pinna; A Sugitani; P Thistlethwaite; Y Kang; L Marongiu; S Todo; T E Starzl; J J Fung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Cirrhotic ascites review: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Christopher M Moore; David H Van Thiel
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-27

Review 4.  Management of ascites.

Authors:  Fedja A Rochling; Rowen K Zetterman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Role of surgical therapy in management of intractable ascites.

Authors:  J Elcheroth; C Vons; D Franco
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Spontaneous central venous thrombosis and shunt occlusion following peritoneovenous shunt placement for intractable ascites.

Authors:  D Hariharan; E A Wilkes; G P Aithal; S J Travis; D N Lobo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.