Literature DB >> 21978210

Very early poststroke aphasia therapy: a pilot randomized controlled efficacy trial.

Erin Godecke1, Kathryn Hird, Erin E Lalor, Tapan Rai, Michael R Phillips.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Early stroke rehabilitation has shown benefits over spontaneous recovery. Insufficient evidence exists to determine the benefits of early aphasia intervention. We hypothesized that daily aphasia therapy would show better communication outcomes than usual care (UC) in early poststroke recovery.
METHOD: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial was conducted in three acute-care hospitals in Perth, Australia, each with over 200 stroke admissions annually. Patients with acute stroke causing moderate to severe aphasia were recruited at a median of three-days (range: 0-10 days) to receive daily aphasia therapy or usual care therapy. Individually tailored, impairment-based intervention was provided for the acute hospital stay or intervention phase (median: 19 days; range: 5-76). Primary outcome measures were the aphasia quotient and functional communication profile at acute hospital discharge or four-weeks poststroke, whichever came first. A random-number generator and sealed envelopes were used to randomize participants. Assessments were completed by a blinded assessor.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine participants were recruited, with six withdrawals (10%) and seven deaths (12%) at six-months. Ninety percent had ischemic strokes, with 56·5% experiencing a total anterior circulation stroke. The group mean (± SD) age was 69·1 (± 13·9) years. Six participants (18·75%) in the daily aphasia therapy group did not complete the minimum (150 min) therapy required for this study. The daily aphasia therapy intervention phase mean therapy session time was 45 min (range: 30-80) and the total mean amount of therapy for the daily aphasia therapy participants was 331 min (range: 30-1415). Four (15%) participants in the usual care group received therapy. The collective total therapy provided to these participants was 295 min over seven sessions. Usual care participants received an average of 10·5 min of therapy per week during the intervention phase. At the primary end point, a generalized estimating equations model demonstrated that after controlling for initial aphasia severity, participants receiving daily aphasia therapy scored 15·1 more points (P = 0·010) on the aphasia quotient and 11·3 more points (P = 0·004) on the functional communication profile than those receiving usual care therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Daily aphasia therapy in very early stroke recovery improved communication outcomes in people with moderate to severe aphasia.
© 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2011 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978210     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00631.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  25 in total

Review 1.  Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Elisheva R Coleman; Rohitha Moudgal; Kathryn Lang; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Oluwole O Awosika; Brett M Kissela; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Increasing aphasia treatment intensity in an acute inpatient rehabilitation program: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Julia Carpenter; Leora R Cherney
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 3.  Language recovery following stroke.

Authors:  Adam Gerstenecker; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

5.  Does Naming Therapy Make Ordering in a Restaurant Easier? Dynamics of Co-Occurring Change in Cognitive-Linguistic and Functional Communication Skills in Aphasia.

Authors:  Erin L Meier; Jeffrey P Johnson; Sarah Villard; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

Authors:  Marian C Brady; Helen Kelly; Jon Godwin; Pam Enderby; Pauline Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-01

7.  Implementation and Effects of an Information Technology-Based Intervention to Support Speech and Language Therapy Among Stroke Patients With Aphasia: Protocol for a Virtual Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Esther S Kim; Laura Laird; Carlee Wilson; Till Bieg; Philip Mildner; Sebastian Möller; Raimund Schatz; Stephanie Schwarz; Robert Spang; Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons; Elizabeth Rochon
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-07-02

8.  A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study.

Authors:  Erin Godecke; Elizabeth Armstrong; Tapan Rai; Natalie Ciccone; Miranda L Rose; Sandy Middleton; Anne Whitworth; Audrey Holland; Fiona Ellery; Graeme J Hankey; Dominique A Cadilhac; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.266

9.  Rotterdam Aphasia Therapy Study (RATS)-3: "The efficacy of intensive cognitive-linguistic therapy in the acute stage of aphasia"; design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Femke Nouwens; Diederik Wj Dippel; Marjolein de Jong-Hagelstein; Evy G Visch-Brink; Peter J Koudstaal; Lonneke M L de Lau
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Effectiveness of enhanced communication therapy in the first four months after stroke for aphasia and dysarthria: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Audrey Bowen; Anne Hesketh; Emma Patchick; Alys Young; Linda Davies; Andy Vail; Andrew F Long; Caroline Watkins; Mo Wilkinson; Gill Pearl; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Pippa Tyrrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.