Literature DB >> 21978056

A planning and delivery study of a rotational IMRT technique with burst delivery.

Kristofer Kainz1, Guang-Pei Chen, Yu-Wen Chang, Douglas Prah, X Sharon Qi, Himanshu P Shukla, Johannes Stahl, X Allen Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A novel rotational IMRT (rIMRT) technique using burst delivery (continuous gantry rotation with beam off during MLC repositioning) is investigated. The authors evaluate the plan quality and delivery efficiency and accuracy of this dynamic technique with a conventional flat 6 MV photon beam.
METHODS: Burst-delivery rIMRT was implemented in a planning system and delivered with a 160-MLC linac. Ten rIMRT plans were generated for five anonymized patient cases encompassing head and neck, brain, prostate, and prone breast. All plans were analyzed retrospectively and not used for treatment. Among the varied plan parameters were the number of optimization points, number of arcs, gantry speed, and gantry angle range (alpha) over which the beam is turned on at each optimization point. Combined rotational/step-and-shoot rIMRT plans were also created by superimposing multiple-segment static fields at several optimization points. The rIMRT trial plans were compared with each other and with plans generated using helical tomotherapy and VMAT. Burst-mode rotational IMRT plans were delivered and verified using a diode array, ionization chambers, thermoluminescent dosimeters, and film.
RESULTS: Burst-mode rIMRT can achieve plan quality comparable to helical tomotherapy, while the former may lead to slightly better OAR sparing for certain cases and the latter generally achieves slightly lower hot spots. Few instances were found in which increasing the number of optimization points above 36, or superimposing step-and-shoot IMRT segments, led to statistically significant improvements in OAR sparing. Using an additional rIMRT partial arc yielded substantial OAR dose improvements for the brain case. Measured doses from the rIMRT plan delivery were within 4% of the plan calculation in low dose gradient regions. Delivery time range was 228-375 s for single-arc rIMRT 200-cGy prescription with a 300 MU/min dose rate, comparable to tomotherapy and VMAT.
CONCLUSIONS: Rotational IMRT with burst delivery, whether combined with static fields or not, yields clinically acceptable and deliverable treatment plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978056     DOI: 10.1118/1.3622612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  VMAT to arclet plan conversion in a treatment planning system : Feasibility and dosimetric relationship between VMAT, arclet, and stationary fields.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Norbert Licht; Ian Norton; Frank Nuesken; Christian Rübe; Jochen Fleckenstein
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Erratum to: Evolution of educational inequalities in mortality among young adults in an urban setting.

Authors:  Hannelore De Grande; Patrick Deboosere; Hadewijch Vandenheede
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Commissioning and first clinical application of mARC treatment.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Frank G Nuesken; Stephanie Kremp; Jan Palm; Norbert P Licht; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  mARC vs. IMRT radiotherapy of the prostate with flat and flattening-filter-free beam energies.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Katharina Bell; Jan Palm; Frank Nuesken; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies - A Planning Study.

Authors:  Katharina Bell; Jochen Fleckenstein; Frank Nuesken; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe; Yvonne Dzierma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Planning for mARC treatments with the Eclipse treatment planning system.

Authors:  Vikren Sarkar; Long Huang; Prema Rassiah-Szegedi; Hui Zhao; Jessica Huang; Martin Szegedi; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Critical appraisal of the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy in the radiation therapy management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Luca Cozzi; Frank Lohr; Antonella Fogliata; Davide Franceschini; Fiorenza De Rose; A R Filippi; Gabriele Guidi; Valentina Vanoni; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Direct aperture optimization using an inverse form of back-projection.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhu; Timothy Cullip; Gregg Tracton; Xiaoli Tang; Jun Lian; John Dooley; Sha X Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A novel implementation of mARC treatment for non-dedicated planning systems using converted IMRT plans.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Frank Nuesken; Norbert Licht; Christian Ruebe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Clinical experience with planning, quality assurance, and delivery of burst-mode modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Kristofer Kainz; Douglas Prah; Ergun Ahunbay; X Allen Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.