Literature DB >> 21978051

Safety considerations for IMRT: executive summary.

Jean M Moran1, Melanie Dempsey, Avraham Eisbruch, Benedick A Fraass, James M Galvin, Geoffrey S Ibbott, Lawrence B Marks.   

Abstract

This report on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is part of a series of white papers addressing patient safety commissioned by the American Society for Radiation Oncology's (ASTRO) Target Safely Campaign. The document has been approved by the ASTRO Board of Directors, endorsed by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD), and reviewed and accepted by the American College of Radiology's Commission on Radiation Oncology. This report is related to other reports of the ASTRO white paper series on patient safety which are still in preparation, and when appropriate it defers to guidance that will be published by those groups in future white papers. This document takes advantage of the large body of work on quality assurance and quality control principles within radiation oncology whenever possible. IMRT provides increased capability to conform isodose distributions to the shape of the target(s), thereby reducing dose to some adjacent critical structures. This promise of IMRT is one of the reasons for its widespread use. However, the promise of IMRT is counterbalanced by the complexity of the IMRT planning and delivery processes, and the associated risks, some of which have been demonstrated by the New York Times reports on serious accidents involving both IMRT and other radiation treatment modalities. This report provides an opportunity to broadly address safe delivery of IMRT, with a primary focus on recommendations for human error prevention and methods to reduce the occurrence of errors or machine malfunctions that can lead to catastrophic failures or errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978051     DOI: 10.1118/1.3600524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Adherence to performance measures and outcomes among men treated for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Samuel R Kaufman; Bruce L Jacobs; Ted A Skolarus; David C Miller; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Alon Z Weizer; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification.

Authors:  Julian Malicki
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-03-06

3.  Monitoring external beam radiotherapy using real-time beam visualization.

Authors:  Cesare H Jenkins; Dominik J Naczynski; Shu-Jung S Yu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Arno J Mundt; Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Frank Rath; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Fiducial detection and registration for 3D IMRT QA with organ-specific dose information.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Wang; Olga Dona; Yuanguang Xu; John Adamovics; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Migration check tool: automatic plan verification following treatment management systems upgrade and database migration.

Authors:  Scott W Hadley; Dale White; Xiaoping Chen; Jean M Moran; Wayne M Keranen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Implementing and integrating a clinically driven electronic medical record for radiation oncology in a large medical enterprise.

Authors:  John P Kirkpatrick; Kim L Light; Robyn M Walker; Debra L Georgas; Phillip A Antoine; Robert W Clough; Heidi B Cozart; Fang-Fang Yin; Sua Yoo; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.

Authors:  Baozhou Sun; Dharanipathy Rangaraj; Sunita Boddu; Murty Goddu; Deshan Yang; Geethpriya Palaniswaamy; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Omar Wooten; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A bias-free, automated planning tool for technique comparison in radiotherapy - application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatments.

Authors:  Christopher Boylan; Carl Rowbottom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis.

Authors:  Kelly C Younge; Don Roberts; Lindsay A Janes; Carlos Anderson; Jean M Moran; Martha M Matuszak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.