Literature DB >> 21977709

A kinematic and kinetic analysis of drop landings in military boots.

G D Oliver1, A J Stone, J M Booker, H A Plummer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine knee valgus in drop landings during three different footwear conditions and to examine the ground reaction forces exhibited during the drop landing in the three different footwear conditions.
METHODS: Sixteen male and female Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) university undergraduate cadets (21 +/- 3 yrs, 79 +/- 12 kg, and 172 +/- 10 cm) volunteered to participate in the study. Kinematic data were collected while participants performed drop landings in three conditions: bare feet, tennis shoes, and issued military boots.
RESULTS: Significant differences among footwear for ground reaction forces (bare feet: 1646 +/- 359%, tennis shoe: 1880 +/- 379%, boot: 1833 +/- 438%; p < 0.05) were found, while there was no significant difference in knee valgus among footwear.
CONCLUSIONS: Though footwear conditions did not affect knee valgus, they did affect ground reaction forces. Participants in this study had yet to receive any military training on how to land properly from a specified height. Further research should be completed to analyze the kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremity during different landing strategies implemented by trained military personnel in order to better understand injury mechanisms of drop landings in this population. It is likely that injury prevention landing techniques would be beneficial if these were employed by the military and not just in the sporting community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21977709     DOI: 10.1136/jramc-157-03-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Army Med Corps        ISSN: 0035-8665            Impact factor:   1.285


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Footwear on Occupational Task Performance and Musculoskeletal Injury Risk: A Scoping Review to Inform Tactical Footwear.

Authors:  Robin Orr; Danny Maupin; Robert Palmer; Elisa F D Canetti; Vini Simas; Ben Schram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk assessment.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Landing Kinematics and Kinetics at the Knee During Different Landing Tasks.

Authors:  Nicholas R Heebner; Deirdre M Rafferty; Meleesa F Wohleber; Andrew J Simonson; Mita Lovalekar; Andrew Reinert; Timothy C Sell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Monitoring Neuromuscular Performance in Military Personnel.

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Jason D Stone; Andrew G Thompson; W Guy Hornsby; Joshua A Hagen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.