Bong-Hae Cho1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dental students in detection of mandibular condyle fractures and the effectiveness of reference panoramic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six undergraduates evaluated 25 panoramic radiographs for condylar fractures and the data were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. After a month, they were divided into two homogeneous groups based on the first results and re-evaluated the images with (group A) or without (group B) reference images. Eight reference images included indications showing either typical condylar fractures or anatomic structures which could be confused with fractures. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis of the difference between the first and the second evaluations for each group, and student's t-test was used between the two groups in the second evaluation. The intra- and inter-observer agreements were evaluated with Kappa statistics. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer agreements were substantial (k=0.66) and moderate (k=0.53), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (Az) in the first evaluation was 0.802. In the second evaluation, it was increased to 0.823 for group A and 0.814 for group B. The difference between the first and second evaluations for group A was statistically significant (p<0.05), however there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the second evaluation. CONCLUSION: Providing reference images to less experienced clinicians would be a good way to improve the diagnostic ability in detecting condylar fracture.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dental students in detection of mandibular condyle fractures and the effectiveness of reference panoramic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six undergraduates evaluated 25 panoramic radiographs for condylar fractures and the data were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. After a month, they were divided into two homogeneous groups based on the first results and re-evaluated the images with (group A) or without (group B) reference images. Eight reference images included indications showing either typical condylar fractures or anatomic structures which could be confused with fractures. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis of the difference between the first and the second evaluations for each group, and student's t-test was used between the two groups in the second evaluation. The intra- and inter-observer agreements were evaluated with Kappa statistics. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer agreements were substantial (k=0.66) and moderate (k=0.53), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (Az) in the first evaluation was 0.802. In the second evaluation, it was increased to 0.823 for group A and 0.814 for group B. The difference between the first and second evaluations for group A was statistically significant (p<0.05), however there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the second evaluation. CONCLUSION: Providing reference images to less experienced clinicians would be a good way to improve the diagnostic ability in detecting condylar fracture.
Authors: I F Wilson; A Lokeh; C I Benjamin; P A Hilger; D D Hamlar; F G Ondrey; J H Tashjian; W Thomas; W Schubert Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Forrest S Roth; Mimi S Kokoska; Eric E Awwad; David S Martin; Garth T Olson; Larry H Hollier; Christopher S Hollenbeak Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Lucas de Paula Lopes Rosado; Izabele Sales Barbosa; Sibele Nascimento de Aquino; Rafael Binato Junqueira; Francielle Silvestre Verner Journal: Imaging Sci Dent Date: 2019-09-24