| Literature DB >> 21977456 |
Hwi Ryun Kwon1, Kyung Wan Min, Hee Jung Ahn, Hee Geum Seok, Jae Hyuk Lee, Gang Seo Park, Kyung Ah Han.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is controversy over whether aerobic or resistance exercise is more effective for improving endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study was aimed to investigate the effects of an aerobic and resistance training program on endothelial function, and the influences of glycemic control, body weight changes, and aerobic capacity in T2DM.Entities:
Keywords: Aerobic exercise; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Endothelial function; Resistance training
Year: 2011 PMID: 21977456 PMCID: PMC3178697 DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.4.364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab J ISSN: 2233-6079 Impact factor: 5.376
Clinical characteristics of study subjects at baseline
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. P values were calculated from ANOVA test among 3 groups.
AEG, aerobic exercise group; REG, resistance exercise group; CG, control group; DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; FMD, flow-mediated vasodilation; EID, endothelium independent vasodilation; AT_VO2, oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold; AEE, activity energy expenditure; TEE, total energy expenditure; DEI, dietary energy intake.
Changes in anthropometric and biochemical variables
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. P values were calculated from ANOVA test between 3 group at the time of 12 week.
AEG, aerobic exercise group; REG, resistance exercise group; CG, control group; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
aComparison between baseline and intervention within group, bSignificantly different compared to control group.
Changes in activity energy expenditure (AEE), dietary energy intake (DEI), and endothelial function
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. P values were calculated from ANOVA test among 3 groups at the time of 12 week.
AEG, aerobic exercise group; REG, resistance exercise group; CG, control group; AT_VO2, uptake oxygen at anaerobic threshold; FMD, flow-mediated vasodilation; EID, endothelium independent vasodilation.
aComparison between baseline and intervention within group, bSignificantly different compared to control group.
Correlations between percent change of endothelial function, HbA1c, weight, and aerobic capacity
HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; AT_VO2, oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold.
Fig. 1Correlations between percent change of uptake oxygen at anaerobic threshold (AT_VO2) and percent change of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (n=40).