| Literature DB >> 21977012 |
Asha Suryanarayanan1, Jing Liang, Edward M Meyer, A Kerstin Lindemeyer, Dev Chandra, Gregg E Homanics, Werner Sieghart, Richard W Olsen, Igor Spigelman.
Abstract
There is considerable evidence that ethanol (EtOH) potentiates γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA(A)R) action, but only GABA(A)Rs containing δ subunits appear sensitive to low millimolar EtOH. The α4 and δ subunits co-assemble into GABA(A)Rs which are relatively highly expressed at extrasynaptic locations in the dentate gyrus where they mediate tonic inhibition. We previously demonstrated reversible- and time-dependent changes in GABA(A)R function and subunit composition in rats after single-dose EtOH intoxication. We concluded that early tolerance to EtOH occurs by over-activation and subsequent internalization of EtOH-sensitive extrasynaptic α4βδ-GABA(A)Rs. Based on this hypothesis, any highly EtOH-sensitive GABA(A)Rs should be subject to internalization following exposure to suitably high EtOH doses. To test this, we studied the GABA(A)Rs in mice with a global deletion of the α4 subunit (KO). The dentate granule cells of these mice exhibited greatly reduced tonic currents and greatly reduced potentiation by acutely applied EtOH, whereas synaptic currents showed heightened sensitivity to low EtOH concentrations. The hippocampus of naive KO mice showed reduced δ subunit protein levels, but increased α2, and γ2 levels compared to wild-type (WT) controls, suggesting at least partial compensation by these subunits in synaptic, highly EtOH-sensitive GABA(A)Rs of KO mice. In WT mice, cross-linking and Western blot analysis at 1 h after an EtOH challenge (3.5 g/kg, i.p.) revealed increased intracellular fraction of the α1, α4, and δ, but not α2, α5, or γ2 subunits. By contrast, we observed significant internalization of α1, α2, δ, and γ2 subunits after a similar EtOH challenge in KO mice. Synaptic currents from naïve KO mice were more sensitive to potentiation by zolpidem (0.3 μM, requiring α1/α2, inactive at α4/5 GABA(A)Rs) than those from naïve WT mice. At 1 h after EtOH, synaptic currents of WT mice were unchanged, whereas those of KO mice were significantly less sensitive to zolpidem, suggesting decreases in functional α1/2βγ GABA(A)Rs. These data further support our hypothesis that EtOH intoxication induces GABA(A)R plasticity via internalization of highly EtOH-sensitive GABA(A)Rs.Entities:
Keywords: alcohol; dentate gyrus; dependence; internalization; receptor trafficking; synaptic transmission; tolerance; withdrawal
Year: 2011 PMID: 21977012 PMCID: PMC3178803 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Altered hippocampal GABA. The hippocampal CA1/dentate gyrus (DG) regions were microdissected from untreated WT and KO mice and prepared for Western blot detection using appropriate antibodies. (A) Example blots of differences in total protein levels of select GABAAR subunits between WT and KO mice. Absorbance values were first normalized to the loading control (β-actin or GAPDH) signal and then expressed as % of total WT signal from the same gel. (B) Summary graph of differences in GABAAR subunit levels between WT and KO mice. Data are mean ± SEM from (n = 4–12 mice/group). †p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test) compared to WT mice.
Figure 2EtOH-induced internalization of α1, α2, and δ subunits in the hippocampus of α4 KO mice. (A) Representative gels from the hippocampal CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG) regions microdissected from WT and KO mice at 1 h after vehicle (saline) or EtOH (3.5 g/kg, i.p.) injection. Note the increases in the intracellular fraction of α1, α4, and δ subunits (*) after EtOH treatment in WT mice. The α4 signal is absent while α5 and δ signal reduced in KO mice. In comparison to vehicle treatment, EtOH treatment induces internalization of α1, α2, δ and γ2 subunits (*) in tissue collected from KO mice at 1 h after treatment. EtOH treatment also caused a significant increase in internalization of α2 subunits in KO mice (†) as compared to EtOH-treated WT mice. (B) Similar experiments in a different gel illustrate internalization of the γ2 subunit (*) at 1 h after EtOH treatment in KO but not WT mice. (C) Example gel illustrating the lack of α5 subunit internalization after EtOH treatment of WT or KO mice. (D) Summary graph of changes in internal subunit levels of WT (open bars) and KO (closed bars) mice 1 h after EtOH intoxication relative to vehicle-treated mice (horizontal 100% line). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 4–12 mice/group). The α4 signal was not detected (0%) in the α4 KO samples. *p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test) compares EtOH-treated with vehicle-treated mice; †p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test) compares WT EtOH-treated to α4KO EtOH-treated groups.
Kinetic properties of mIPSCs in DG cells from saline- and EtOH-exposed WT and KO mice.
| WT | KO | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-saline | Post-EtOH | Post-saline | Post-EtOH | |
| Amplitude (pA) | 20.9 ± 1.0 | 19.0 ± 1.6 | 15.0 ± 1.8† | 15.8 ± 2.8 |
| Rise time (ms) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.2 |
| Decay τ1 (ms) | 8.1 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 2.2 | 8.5 ± 1.5 |
| Decay τ2 (ms) | 12.3 ± 1.4 | 18.1 ± 1.9 | 16.3 ± 2.7 | 18.3 ± 3.0 |
| Area (fC) | 291.3 ± 24.7 | 269.1 ± 21.1 | 263.9 ± 33.4 | 290.9 ± 45.7 |
| Frequency (Hz) | 12.3 ± 0.5 | 11.7 ± 0.5 | 10.2 ± 0.4 | 10.2 ± 1.2 |
| 9 | 15 | 6 | 5 | |
*.
.
All data are expressed as % ± SEM.
Zolpidem (0.3 μM) effects on mIPSC kinetics in DG cells from saline- and EtOH-exposed WT and KO mice.
| WT | KO | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-saline | Post-EtOH | Post-saline | Post-EtOH | |
| Amplitude | 102.3 ± 0.8 | 100.8 ± 0.4 | 101.6 ± 7.5 | 106.3 ± 0.5 |
| Rise time | 126.2 ± 9.9 | 160.7 ± 16.4 | 168.6 ± 32.1 | 189.0 ± 41.4 |
| Decay τ1 | 156.9 ± 17.5 | 141.1 ± 11.8 | 279.9 ± 49.1 | 167.8 ± 10.6 |
| Decay τ2 | 224.2 ± 85.9 | 216.1 ± 61.2 | 183.5 ± 14.5 | 156.0 ± 11.5 |
| Area | 142.4 ± 10.9 | 132.3 ± 8.1 | 213.4 ± 2.8 | 150.7 ± 4.0 |
| Frequency | 100.7 ± 1.3 | 100.3 ± 2.3 | 99.7 ± 3.4 | 105.6 ± 1.1 |
| 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | |
*p < 0.05 from post-saline.
.
All data are expressed as % ±SEM of a pre-drug parameter.
Figure 3Altered enhancement of mIPSCs by zolpidem in DG cells from α4 KO mice. Examples of averaged mIPSCs before and after zolpidem (ZP, 0.3 μM) application in DG cells from saline- (upper traces) and EtOH-treated (lower traces) WT (A) and α4 KO (B) mice. Slices were prepared at 50–60 min after EtOH administration. Cells were voltage-clamped at 0 mV and averaged mIPSCs were aligned at baseline. (C): summary graph of mIPSC potentiation by zolpidem in WT and KO mice. Note the unchanged mIPSC potentiation by zolpidem at 1 h after EtOH administration in WT mice. Also note the increased mIPSC potentiation in saline-treated KO mice and decreased mIPSC potentiation in EtOH-treated KO mice. *p < 0.05 from other groups (one-way RM ANOVA).