Y Zhou1, H Shi, Y Wang, A R Kumar, B Chi, P Han. 1. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital Attached to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the correlation between CT angiographic clot load (CTACL) score, pulmonary perfusion defect (PPD) score and the global right ventricular function in the assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE) severity. METHODS: 49 patients with acute PE, who underwent dual-source CT scan, were included in the study. CT angiography and perfusion imaging were performed. Data from electrocardiogram-gated coronary angiography scanning protocol were used for right ventricular function analysis. Two readers evaluated the CTACL and PPD scores using the Qanadli and Chae methods, respectively. RESULTS: The PPD score had a strong positive correlation with the CTACL score (r=0.72, p<0.001) and both scores in turn had a strong positive correlation with the right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio (r=0.60, r=0.62, p<0.001). However, the PPD score had a strong negative correlation with ejection fraction (EF) (r=-0.63, p<0.001) while the CTACL score had a low negative correlation with EF (r=-0.33, p=0.02). Between the RV/LV<1 group (n=35) and the RV/LV >1 group (n=14), the PPD score, CTACL score, pulmonary artery trunk diameter, EF and reflux of inferior vena cava were significantly different, all with p<0.001. The end-systolic volume (p=0.01) was significantly different but the end-diastolic volume (p=0.11) and stroke volume (p=0.08) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Therefore, considering PPD scores, CTACL scores and cardiovascular manifestations together may be helpful in the evaluation of PE severity.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the correlation between CT angiographic clot load (CTACL) score, pulmonary perfusion defect (PPD) score and the global right ventricular function in the assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE) severity. METHODS: 49 patients with acute PE, who underwent dual-source CT scan, were included in the study. CT angiography and perfusion imaging were performed. Data from electrocardiogram-gated coronary angiography scanning protocol were used for right ventricular function analysis. Two readers evaluated the CTACL and PPD scores using the Qanadli and Chae methods, respectively. RESULTS: The PPD score had a strong positive correlation with the CTACL score (r=0.72, p<0.001) and both scores in turn had a strong positive correlation with the right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio (r=0.60, r=0.62, p<0.001). However, the PPD score had a strong negative correlation with ejection fraction (EF) (r=-0.63, p<0.001) while the CTACL score had a low negative correlation with EF (r=-0.33, p=0.02). Between the RV/LV<1 group (n=35) and the RV/LV >1 group (n=14), the PPD score, CTACL score, pulmonary artery trunk diameter, EF and reflux of inferior vena cava were significantly different, all with p<0.001. The end-systolic volume (p=0.01) was significantly different but the end-diastolic volume (p=0.11) and stroke volume (p=0.08) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Therefore, considering PPD scores, CTACL scores and cardiovascular manifestations together may be helpful in the evaluation of PE severity.
Authors: Rene Quiroz; Nils Kucher; U Joseph Schoepf; Florian Kipfmueller; Scott D Solomon; Philip Costello; Samuel Z Goldhaber Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-05-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Patrick Reinartz; Joachim E Wildberger; Wolfgang Schaefer; Bernd Nowak; Andreas H Mahnken; Ulrich Buell Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S D Qanadli; M El Hajjam; A Vieillard-Baron; T Joseph; B Mesurolle; V L Oliva; O Barré; F Bruckert; O Dubourg; P Lacombe Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Joachim E Wildberger; U Joseph Schoepf; Andreas H Mahnken; Peter Herzog; Hendrik Ditt; Matthias U Niethammer; Stefan Schaller; Ernst Klotz; Rolf W Günther Journal: Semin Roentgenol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 0.800
Authors: Rutger W van der Meer; Peter M T Pattynama; Marco J L van Strijen; Annette A van den Berg-Huijsmans; Ieneke J C Hartmann; Hein Putter; Albert de Roos; Menno V Huisman Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu; Felix G Meinel; Andrew D McQuiston; James G Ravenel; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ioannis Vlahos; Megan C Jacobsen; Myrna C Godoy; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Rick R Layman Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: José Luis Alonso Martinez; Francisco Javier Anniccherico Sánchez; Miren Aranzazu Urbieta Echezarreta; Ione Villar García; Jorge Rojo Álvaro Journal: N Am J Med Sci Date: 2016-03