Literature DB >> 21976042

Opposite effects of amphetamine on impulsive action with fixed and variable delays to respond.

Scott J Hayton1, Amanda C Maracle, Mary C Olmstead.   

Abstract

Impulsive action, the failure to withhold an inappropriate response, is treated clinically with dopamine agonists such as amphetamine. Despite the therapeutic efficacy, these drugs have inconsistent effects on impulsive action in rodents, causing improvements or disruptions in different tasks. Thus, we hypothesized that amphetamine is producing an effect by altering distinct cognitive processes in each task. To test this idea, we used the response inhibition (RI) task and trained rats to withhold responding for sucrose until a signal is presented. We then varied the duration that subjects were required to inhibit responding (short=4 s; long=60 s; or variable=1-60 s) and examined whether this influenced the pattern of premature responses. We also tested the effects of amphetamine (0.0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) on each task variant. The probability of premature responding varied across the premature interval with a unique pattern of time-dependent errors emerging in each condition. Amphetamine also had distinct effects on each version: the drug promoted premature responding when subjects expected a consistent delay, regardless of its duration, but reduced premature responding when the delay was unpredictable. We propose that the ability to inhibit a motor response is controlled by a different combination of cognitive processes in the three task conditions. These include timing, conditioned avoidance, and attention, which then interact with amphetamine to increase or decrease impulsive action. The effect of amphetamine on impulsive action, therefore, is not universal, but depends on the subject's experience and expectation of the task demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21976042      PMCID: PMC3260977          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  44 in total

Review 1.  ADHD, substance use disorders, and psychostimulant treatment: current literature and treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Scott H Kollins
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.256

Review 2.  The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Behavioral disinhibition requires dopamine receptor activation.

Authors:  Marcel M van Gaalen; Reinhild J Brueggeman; Patricia F C Bronius; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  A rat model of distractibility: effects of drugs modifying dopaminergic, noradrenergic and GABAergic neurotransmission.

Authors:  A Agmo; C Belzung; C Rodríguez
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Similar effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on the performance of complex operant tasks in rats.

Authors:  A J Mayorga; E J Popke; C M Fogle; M G Paule
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine on timing in the rat.

Authors:  D A Eckerman; D Segbefia; S Manning; G S Breese
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking.

Authors:  David Belin; Adam C Mar; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Differential effects of psychomotor stimulants on attentional performance in rats: nicotine, amphetamine, caffeine and methylphenidate.

Authors:  L Bizarro; S Patel; C Murtagh; I P Stolerman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Fluoxetine prevents the disruptive effects of fenfluramine on differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-second schedule performance.

Authors:  J B Richards; K E Sabol; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Similar effects of the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine on three distinct forms of impulsivity in the rat.

Authors:  Emma S J Robinson; Dawn M Eagle; Adam C Mar; Andrea Bari; Gargi Banerjee; Xiaosu Jiang; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  7 in total

1.  Increased impulsive action in rats: effects of morphine in a short and long fixed-delay response inhibition task.

Authors:  Megan K Mahoney; Mason M Silveira; Mary C Olmstead
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The effects of early life stress on impulsivity.

Authors:  Evelyn Ordoñes Sanchez; Debra A Bangasser
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 9.052

Review 3.  Animal models of serotonergic psychedelics.

Authors:  James B Hanks; Javier González-Maeso
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Functional coding variation in the presynaptic dopamine transporter associated with neuropsychiatric disorders drives enhanced motivation and context-dependent impulsivity in mice.

Authors:  Gwynne L Davis; Adele Stewart; Gregg D Stanwood; Raajaram Gowrishankar; Maureen K Hahn; Randy D Blakely
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Dissociations between interval timing and intertemporal choice following administration of fluoxetine, cocaine, or methamphetamine.

Authors:  Sarah R Heilbronner; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Psychopharmacological characterisation of the successive negative contrast effect in rats.

Authors:  C E Phelps; E N Mitchell; D J Nutt; H M Marston; E S J Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Variable delay-to-signal: a fast paradigm for assessment of aspects of impulsivity in rats.

Authors:  Hugo Leite-Almeida; António Melo; José M Pêgo; Sara Bernardo; Nuno Milhazes; Fernanda Borges; Nuno Sousa; Armando Almeida; João J Cerqueira
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.