Literature DB >> 21976034

Possible logistic and sociodemographyc factors on breast cancer screening in Turkey: lessons from a women’s health project in Mersin province.

Huseyin Abali1, Alper Ata, Gozde Gokçe, Huseyin Gokçe.   

Abstract

Mortality from breast cancer is decreasing partly owing to early detection. In Mersin province in our country, local health authorities launched an education program on sexual diseases and breast cancer early detection for women over 15 years of age. After the educational session, clinical breast examination was offered by a nurse or physician, and if suspicious they were recommended to apply a specialist for further examination. Here, we report the results on those women with abnormal clinical breast examination. In this second project, socio-demographic variables were investigated such as educational level and place of living,parameters to measure the success of previous project, whether they followed the recommendation themselves, whether mammograms were reported in accordance with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS). Of 3,793 women recruited, mean age was 42.2 years, 42.3%were younger than 40.0 years. Majority (88.5%) were married, graduate of primary school (60.6%), without a job(91.2%), and inhabiting in the province (38.7%). Of the population, 98.1% believe in the importance of screening in the treatment of breast cancer. According to 70.3%,monthly breast self-examination enables early detection, 33.5% believe that clinical breast examination detects cancer early, and 35.5% think that annual mammography can detect it early. Among 2,183 women 40 years of age or over, 41.5% had mammography at once before participating in the first project. Breast self-examination was being carried out by 56.6% on a monthly basis. After an abnormal breast examination, 86.4% applied to hospitals for specialist examination. Reasons for declining to seek for further examination among 410 women answering were as follows:42.0% did not accept, 27.0% did not know it was important, 16.6% because of economical reasons, and 5.0% were too shy to be examined. Being older, being married, being the graduate of primary and secondary school, residing in rural areas, having a mammogram positively affected the decision in univariate analyses (p<0.05). All but educational level (p=0.059) remained significant in multivariate analysis. Mammography was reported in accordance with BIRADS in only 45 (1.2%). Awareness of population on breast cancer early detection can be raised through education. Generally, women follow professional recommendation from professionals. Mammography reporting among radiologist in accordance with BIRADS is rare. Successful early detection of breast cancer may be obtained by public education together with improving detection methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21976034     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0270-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  9 in total

1.  The effectiveness of a nurse-delivered breast health promotion program on breast cancer screening behaviours in non-adherent Turkish women: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Selda Secginli; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Mammography device use in Turkey, and quantity and quality analysis of mammography education.

Authors:  Nuray Voyvoda; Ayşegül Ozdemir; Serap Gültekin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Socio-demographic parameters in screening for breast cancer: Lessons from a population-'based women's Health Project held in a province in Turkey.

Authors:  M Hayran; H Abali; S Kilickap; T Mentes; H Aksoy; A Kemik; H Gokce; H Gokdemir; S Toplar; D Kaya; G G Isbir
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Factors associated with breast cancer screening behaviours in a sample of Turkish women: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Selda Secginli; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Mammography utilization among Turkish women.

Authors:  Ganime Sadikoglu; Alis Ozcakir; Fatma Dogan; Sehsuvar Gokgoz; Nazan Bilgel
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010

6.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Improving Breast Cancer Control via the Use of Community Health Workers in South Africa: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Brianna M Wadler; Christine M Judge; Marianne Prout; Jennifer D Allen; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 4.375

8.  The effectiveness of training for breast cancer and breast self-examination in women aged 40 and over.

Authors:  I Irem Budakoglu; Isil Maral; Aysegul Ozdemir; M Ali Bumin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Determinants of the number of mammography units in 31 countries with significant mammography screening.

Authors:  P Autier; D Ait Ouakrim; D A Ouakrim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.