BACKGROUND: Cultural competency is an important part of medical policy and practice, yet the evidence base for the effectiveness of training in this area is weak. One reason is the lack of valid, reliable, and feasible tools to quantify measures of knowledge, skill, and attitudes before and/or after cultural training. Given that cultural competency is a critical aspect of "professionalism" and "interpersonal and communication skills," such a tool would aid in assessing the impact of such training in residency programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to enhance the feasibility and extend the validity of a tool to assess cultural competency in resident physicians. The work contributes to efforts to evaluate resident preparedness for working with diverse patient populations. METHOD: Eighty-four residents (internal medicine, psychiatry, obstetrics-gynecology, and surgery) completed the Cross-Cultural Care Survey (CCCS) to assess their self-reported knowledge, skill, and attitudes regarding the provision of cross-cultural care. The study entailed descriptive analyses, factor analysis, internal consistency, and validity tests using bivariate correlations. RESULTS: Feasibility of using the CCCS was demonstrated with reduced survey completion time and ease of administration, and the survey reliably measures knowledge, skill, and attitudes for providing cross-cultural care. Resident characteristics and amount of postgraduate training relate differently to the 3 different subscales of the CCCS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that the CCCS is a reliable and valid tool to assess baseline attitudes of cultural competency across specialties in residency programs. Implications of the subscale scores for designing training programs are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Cultural competency is an important part of medical policy and practice, yet the evidence base for the effectiveness of training in this area is weak. One reason is the lack of valid, reliable, and feasible tools to quantify measures of knowledge, skill, and attitudes before and/or after cultural training. Given that cultural competency is a critical aspect of "professionalism" and "interpersonal and communication skills," such a tool would aid in assessing the impact of such training in residency programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to enhance the feasibility and extend the validity of a tool to assess cultural competency in resident physicians. The work contributes to efforts to evaluate resident preparedness for working with diverse patient populations. METHOD: Eighty-four residents (internal medicine, psychiatry, obstetrics-gynecology, and surgery) completed the Cross-Cultural Care Survey (CCCS) to assess their self-reported knowledge, skill, and attitudes regarding the provision of cross-cultural care. The study entailed descriptive analyses, factor analysis, internal consistency, and validity tests using bivariate correlations. RESULTS: Feasibility of using the CCCS was demonstrated with reduced survey completion time and ease of administration, and the survey reliably measures knowledge, skill, and attitudes for providing cross-cultural care. Resident characteristics and amount of postgraduate training relate differently to the 3 different subscales of the CCCS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that the CCCS is a reliable and valid tool to assess baseline attitudes of cultural competency across specialties in residency programs. Implications of the subscale scores for designing training programs are discussed.
Authors: Mary Catherine Beach; Eboni G Price; Tiffany L Gary; Karen A Robinson; Aysegul Gozu; Ana Palacio; Carole Smarth; Mollie W Jenckes; Carolyn Feuerstein; Eric B Bass; Neil R Powe; Lisa A Cooper Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Eboni G Price; Mary Catherine Beach; Tiffany L Gary; Karen A Robinson; Aysegul Gozu; Ana Palacio; Carole Smarth; Mollie Jenckes; Carolyn Feuerstein; Eric B Bass; Neil R Powe; Lisa A Cooper Journal: Acad Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Aysegul Gozu; Mary Catherine Beach; Eboni G Price; Tiffany L Gary; Karen Robinson; Ana Palacio; Carole Smarth; Mollie Jenckes; Carolyn Feuerstein; Eric B Bass; Neil R Powe; Lisa A Cooper Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Joel S Weissman; Joseph Betancourt; Eric G Campbell; Elyse R Park; Minah Kim; Brian Clarridge; David Blumenthal; Karen C Lee; Angela W Maina Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-09-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elyse R Park; Maria B J Chun; Joseph R Betancourt; Alexander R Green; Joel S Weissman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Fatima Syed Amanullah; Adil Al-Karim Manji; Bilal Ahmed Usmani; Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan; Hadia Sohail; Muhammad Haris Zahid; Meryum Ishrat Baig; Inara Merani; Shehryar Ali Larik; Shahmeer Raza Khan; Syeda Ramlah Tul Sania Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Sharon Pang; Hursuong Vongsachang; Thomas K Le; George Q Zhang; Taibo Li; Jason T C Lee; Shari M Lawson Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Nancy Denizard-Thompson; Deepak Palakshappa; Andrea Vallevand; Debanjali Kundu; Amber Brooks; Gia DiGiacobbe; Deborah Griffith; JaNae Joyner; Anna C Snavely; David P Miller Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Alejandra Casillas; Sophie Paroz; Alexander R Green; Hans Wolff; Orest Weber; Florence Faucherre; Françoise Ninane; Patrick Bodenmann Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Alexander R Green; Maria B J Chun; Marina C Cervantes; Jacob D Nudel; Jason V Duong; Edward Krupat; Joseph R Betancourt Journal: Health Equity Date: 2017-01-01