OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBP8298 in subjects with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) who express human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype DR2 or DR4 (DR2(+) or DR4(+)). METHODS: This multicenter randomized 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 612 subjects with a diagnosis of SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.5-6.5, stratified according to baseline EDSS score (3.5-5.0, or 5.5-6.5) and HLA haplotype (DR2(+) or DR4(+), or DR2(-)/DR4(-)). Upon entry of 100 DR2(-)/DR4(-) subjects, further study enrollment was limited to DR2(+) or DR4(+) subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to either 500 mg MBP8298 or placebo, given by IV injection once every 6 months for 2 years. The primary outcome measure was time to progression by ≥1.0 EDSS point (or 0.5 point if baseline EDSS was 5.5 or higher), confirmed 6 months later. Secondary outcomes included mean change in EDSS, mean change in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, MRI changes, annualized relapse rate, and quality of life. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups in either the primary or secondary endpoints. MBP8298 was well tolerated in all treated subjects with no safety issues identified. CONCLUSION: In the population studied, treatment with MBP8298 did not provide a clinical benefit compared to placebo. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class 1 evidence that MBP8298 is not effective in patients with SPMS who are HLA DR2(+) or DR4(+).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBP8298 in subjects with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) who express human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype DR2 or DR4 (DR2(+) or DR4(+)). METHODS: This multicenter randomized 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 612 subjects with a diagnosis of SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.5-6.5, stratified according to baseline EDSS score (3.5-5.0, or 5.5-6.5) and HLA haplotype (DR2(+) or DR4(+), or DR2(-)/DR4(-)). Upon entry of 100 DR2(-)/DR4(-) subjects, further study enrollment was limited to DR2(+) or DR4(+) subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to either 500 mg MBP8298 or placebo, given by IV injection once every 6 months for 2 years. The primary outcome measure was time to progression by ≥1.0 EDSS point (or 0.5 point if baseline EDSS was 5.5 or higher), confirmed 6 months later. Secondary outcomes included mean change in EDSS, mean change in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, MRI changes, annualized relapse rate, and quality of life. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups in either the primary or secondary endpoints. MBP8298 was well tolerated in all treated subjects with no safety issues identified. CONCLUSION: In the population studied, treatment with MBP8298 did not provide a clinical benefit compared to placebo. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class 1 evidence that MBP8298 is not effective in patients with SPMS who are HLA DR2(+) or DR4(+).
Authors: Marcus W Koch; Lawrence Korngut; David G Patry; Yahya Agha-Khani; Christopher White; Justyna R Sarna; Michael Yeung; V Wee Yong; Daniel Y C Heng; Gary Cutter; Luanne Metz Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Duncheng Wang; Debjani Ghosh; S M Touhidul Islam; Cody D Moorman; Ashton E Thomason; Daniel S Wilkinson; Mark D Mannie Journal: J Immunol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Finn Sellebjerg; Diego Cadavid; Deborah Steiner; Luisa Maria Villar; Richard Reynolds; Daniel Mikol Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.570
Authors: Daniel R Getts; Aaron J Martin; Derrick P McCarthy; Rachael L Terry; Zoe N Hunter; Woon Teck Yap; Meghann Teague Getts; Michael Pleiss; Xunrong Luo; Nicholas J C King; Lonnie D Shea; Stephen D Miller Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-11-18 Impact factor: 54.908