BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CHADS(2) and CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores are useful to stratify embolic risks in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to identify patients eligible for anticoagulation. Although the risk of stoke increases in patients with higher CHADS(2) or CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores, it is uncertain why the stroke rate increases in them. Concomitant potential cardiac sources of embolism (PCSE) may be more frequent in patients with higher CHADS(2) or CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores because stroke risks increase when concomitant PCSE is present in Atrial fibrillation (AF). On the other hand, atherothrombosis may be the cause when considering that most components of the CHADS(2) and CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores are risk factors for atherosclerosis. METHODS: Amongst 5493 stroke patients who were prospectively registered with the stroke registry for 11years, 860 consecutive patients with NVAF were included for this study. We investigated the mechanisms of stroke according to the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score in stroke patients with NVAF. RESULTS: Amongst 860 patients, concomitant PCSE were found in 334 patients (38.8%). The number of PCSE increased as the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score increased (P<0.001). Of individual PCSE, akinetic left ventricular segment, hypokinetic left ventricular segment and myocardial infarction <4weeks were associated with the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score. The presence of possible atherothrombotic mechanism, in addition to AF, was suggested in 27.3%. The proportion of patients with concomitant presence of possible atherothrombosis was increased as the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score increased (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased frequency of concomitant PCSE and that of the atherothrombotic mechanism may explain the high risk of stroke in patients with higher CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CHADS(2) and CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores are useful to stratify embolic risks in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to identify patients eligible for anticoagulation. Although the risk of stoke increases in patients with higher CHADS(2) or CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores, it is uncertain why the stroke rate increases in them. Concomitant potential cardiac sources of embolism (PCSE) may be more frequent in patients with higher CHADS(2) or CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores because stroke risks increase when concomitant PCSE is present in Atrial fibrillation (AF). On the other hand, atherothrombosis may be the cause when considering that most components of the CHADS(2) and CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores are risk factors for atherosclerosis. METHODS: Amongst 5493 strokepatients who were prospectively registered with the stroke registry for 11years, 860 consecutive patients with NVAF were included for this study. We investigated the mechanisms of stroke according to the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score in strokepatients with NVAF. RESULTS: Amongst 860 patients, concomitant PCSE were found in 334 patients (38.8%). The number of PCSE increased as the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score increased (P<0.001). Of individual PCSE, akinetic left ventricular segment, hypokinetic left ventricular segment and myocardial infarction <4weeks were associated with the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score. The presence of possible atherothrombotic mechanism, in addition to AF, was suggested in 27.3%. The proportion of patients with concomitant presence of possible atherothrombosis was increased as the CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score increased (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased frequency of concomitant PCSE and that of the atherothrombotic mechanism may explain the high risk of stroke in patients with higher CHADS(2) /CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score.
Authors: Rod Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Anna Huskin; Todd T Tomson; Richard Bernstein; Ethan Ellis; Jonathan W Waks; Peter Zimetbaum Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2015-11-23
Authors: Karney Lahad; Elad Maor; Robert Klempfner; Chagai Grossman; Amit Druyan; Ilan Ben-Zvi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: J Huang; S L Wu; Y M Xue; H W Fei; Q W Lin; S Q Ren; H T Liao; X Z Zhan; X H Fang; L Xu Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 3.411