Literature DB >> 21972404

CYP2C19 but not PON1 genetic variants influence clopidogrel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy in post-myocardial infarction patients.

Jean-Sébastien Hulot1, Jean-Philippe Collet, Guillaume Cayla, Johanne Silvain, Frédérick Allanic, Anne Bellemain-Appaix, Stuart A Scott, Gilles Montalescot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduced concentrations of clopidogrel active metabolite have been associated with diminished platelet inhibition and higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events. Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) has recently been proposed as a key enzyme for clopidogrel metabolic activation. We tested the effects of PON1 polymorphisms on clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the occurrence of cardiovascular outcomes in young post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with clopidogrel. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We genotyped PON1 (Q192R and L55M) and CYP2C19 variants in 106 patients enrolled in the PK/PD CLOVIS-2 trial. Patients were randomly exposed to a 300-mg or 900-mg clopidogrel loading dose in a crossover study design. Clopidogrel active metabolite isomer H4 (clopi-H4) and platelet function testing were measured serially after loading dose. There was no significant association between PON1 Q192R or L55M and clopi-H4 formation or antiplatelet response to clopidogrel after either loading dose. Using multivariable linear regression analyses, the CYP2C19*2 allele was the only predictor of clopi-H4 generation and platelet response irrespective of the platelet function assay. CYP2C19 loss-of-function but not PON1 variants were significantly associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events (death, MI, and urgent coronary revascularization) occurring during long-term clopidogrel exposure in 371 young post-MI patients (age <45 years) enrolled in the AFIJI cohort (CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carrier versus noncarrier: hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.41, P=0.02; PON1 QQ192 versus QR/RR192: hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-2.11, P=0.93; PON1 LL55 versus LM/MM55: hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-3.08, P=0.24).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not confirm that PON1 Q192R or L55M can influence clopidogrel pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics in post-MI patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21972404     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  34 in total

Review 1.  Personalized medicine: is it a pharmacogenetic mirage?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Devron R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  The pharmacogenetic control of antiplatelet response: candidate genes and CYP2C19.

Authors:  Yao Yang; Joshua P Lewis; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Stuart A Scott
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  Genetically Determined Platelet Reactivity and Related Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Teresa Strisciuglio; Giuseppe Di Gioia; Chiara De Biase; Massimiliano Esposito; Danilo Franco; Bruno Trimarco; Emanuele Barbato
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-05-19

Review 4.  Current antiplatelet agents: place in therapy and role of genetic testing.

Authors:  Eugene Yang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  The paraoxonase-1 pathway is not a major bioactivation pathway of clopidogrel in vitro.

Authors:  V Ancrenaz; J Desmeules; R James; P Fontana; J-L Reny; P Dayer; Y Daali
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Genetic determinants of response to cardiovascular drugs.

Authors:  Quinn S Wells; Jessica T Delaney; Dan M Roden
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Relationships between PON1 Q192R polymorphism and clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Li; Shu-Hong Bu; Xiao-Tong Lu; Li-Xia Li; A-Jing Xu; Yue-Nian Tang; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 8.  Recent advances in the pharmacogenetics of clopidogrel.

Authors:  Thomas Cuisset; Pierre-Emmanuel Morange; Marie-Christine Alessi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Monitoring aspirin and clopidogrel response: testing controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Athanasios Karathanos; Tobias Geisler
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  PON1 Q192R genetic variant and response to clopidogrel and prasugrel: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica L Mega; Sandra L Close; Stephen D Wiviott; Michael Man; Suman Duvvuru; Joseph R Walker; Scott S Sundseth; Jean-Philippe Collet; Jessica T Delaney; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Sabina A Murphy; Guillaume Paré; Matthew J Price; Dirk Sibbing; Tabassome Simon; Dietmar Trenk; Elliott M Antman; Marc S Sabatine
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.