Literature DB >> 21972401

Bleeding risk comparing targeted low-dose heparin with bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a propensity score-matched analysis of the Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) registry.

Sripal Bangalore1, David J Cohen, Neal S Kleiman, Tal Regev-Beinart, Sunil V Rao, Michael J Pencina, Laura Mauri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior randomized trials have shown reduced bleeding with bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is not known if this benefit is also present when UFH doses are more tightly controlled (as measured by activated clotting time, ACT). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients enrolled in the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry, were divided into 3 groups, based on the antithrombotic drug used during PCI (UFH monotherapy, UFH+glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitor [GPI], or bivalirudin alone). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured covariates (89 variables) and to compare bivalirudin versus UFH monotherapy and bivalirudin versus UFH+GPI groups. The UFH groups were stratified based on ACT achieved (optimal ACT defined as 250-300 for UFH monotherapy and 200-250 when GPI was also used). The primary bleeding outcome was in-hospital composite bleeding, defined as events of access site bleeding, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major/minor bleeding, or transfusion. Primary (in-hospital death/myocardial infarction) and secondary ischemic outcomes (death/MI/unplanned repeat revascularization at 12 months) were also evaluated. Propensity score matching yielded 3022 patients for the UFH monotherapy versus bivalirudin comparison and 3520 patients for the UFH+GPI versus bivalirudin comparison. Bivalirudin use was associated with numerically lower bleeding rates at all categories of achieved ACT when compared with UFH (low, optimal, high ACT: 2.5% versus 4.7%, 1.9% versus 6.0%, 3.1% versus 4.8%, respectively) or heparin+GPI groups (low, optimal, high ACT: 0.0% versus 2.7%, 2.7% versus 5.2%, 2.4% versus 6.1%, respectively) and was not associated with any statistically significant increase in either primary or secondary ischemic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Among unselected patients undergoing PCI, bivalirudin use during PCI was associated with a lower risk of bleeding at all comparator ACT levels without an increase in ischemic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21972401     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.961912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  4 in total

1.  Activated protein C modulates cardiac metabolism and augments autophagy in the ischemic heart.

Authors:  R Costa; A Morrison; J Wang; C Manithody; J Li; A R Rezaie
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Does VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART invalidate the use of bivalirudin in myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Caroline Ong; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  The Use of Bivalirudin in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery and in the Interventional Cardiology Suite.

Authors:  Dheeraj Goswami; Matthew DiGiusto; Rajeev Wadia; Sean Barnes; Jamie Schwartz; Diana Steppan; Kristen Nelson-McMillan; Richard Ringel; Jochen Steppan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Comparison of bivalirudin and radial access across a spectrum of preprocedural risk of bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the national cardiovascular data registry.

Authors:  Dmitri V Baklanov; Sunghee Kim; Steven P Marso; Sumeet Subherwal; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.