Literature DB >> 21972393

Why conventional exhaled breath condensate pH studies cannot provide reliable estimates of airway acidification.

Richard M Effros1, Richard Casaburi2, Janos Porszasz2, Virender Rehan3.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21972393      PMCID: PMC3415116          DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-0974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Exhaled breath condensate pH assays are not influenced by oral ammonia.

Authors:  K Wells; J Vaughan; T N Pajewski; S Hom; L Ngamtrakulpanit; A Smith; A Nguyen; R Turner; J Hunt
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Assessment of exhaled breath condensate pH.

Authors:  Richard M Effros; Richard Casaburi; Janos Porszasz; Virender K Rehan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  The effects of volatile salivary acids and bases on exhaled breath condensate pH.

Authors:  Richard M Effros; Richard Casaburi; Jennifer Su; Marshall Dunning; John Torday; Julie Biller; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Endogenous airway acidification. Implications for asthma pathophysiology.

Authors:  J F Hunt; K Fang; R Malik; A Snyder; N Malhotra; T A Platts-Mills; B Gaston
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Determinants of exhaled breath condensate pH in a large population with asthma.

Authors:  Lei Liu; W Gerald Teague; Serpil Erzurum; Anne Fitzpatrick; Sneha Mantri; Raed A Dweik; Eugene R Bleecker; Deborah Meyers; William W Busse; William J Calhoun; Mario Castro; Kian Fan Chung; Douglas Curran-Everett; Elliot Israel; W Nizar Jarjour; Wendy Moore; Stephen P Peters; Sally Wenzel; John F Hunt; Benjamin Gaston
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.410

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.