Literature DB >> 21971766

Measuring the potency labelling of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox(®)) and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin (®)) in an LD50 assay.

Dirk Dressler1, Gerd Mander, Klaus Fink.   

Abstract

The biological potency of botulinum toxin (BT) drugs is determined by a standardised LD50 assay. However, the potency labelling varies vary amongst different BT drugs. One reason for this may be differences in the LD50 assays applied. When five unexpired batches of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox(®)) and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(®)) are compared in the Xeomin(®) batch release assay, the potency variability of both BT drugs fell within the range allowed by the European Pharmacopoiea. Statistical analyses failed to detect differences in the potency labelling of both products. Although the existence of a conversion ratio has been questioned recently, our experimental data are in line with previous clinical experience showing that Botox(®) and Xeomin(®) can be compared using a 1:1 conversion ratio. Identical potency labelling allows easy exchange of both BT drugs in a therapeutic setting, and direct comparison of efficacy, adverse effects and costs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21971766     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-011-0719-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  13 in total

1.  Respective potencies of Botox and Dysport: a double blind, randomised, crossover study in cervical dystonia.

Authors:  D Ranoux; C Gury; J Fondarai; J L Mas; M Zuber
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  A new botulinum toxin type A free of complexing proteins for treatment of cervical dystonia.

Authors:  R Benecke; W H Jost; P Kanovsky; E Ruzicka; G Comes; S Grafe
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Potency evaluation of a formulated drug product containing 150-kd botulinum neurotoxin type A.

Authors:  Terrence Hunt; Kenneth Clarke
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.592

4.  Experimental conditions substantially influence botulinum toxin potency testing.

Authors:  Gerd Mander; Klaus Fink; Martin Vey
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.592

5.  Comparing Botox and Xeomin for axillar hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Dirk Dressler
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Dose standardisation of botulinum toxin.

Authors:  M H Marion; M Sheehy; S Sangla; S Soulayrol
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Potency equivalence of botulinum toxin preparations.

Authors:  P Hambleton; A M Pickett
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Dose standardisation of botulinum toxin.

Authors:  E R First; L B Pearce; G E Borodic
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-04-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Botulinum toxin: dangerous terminology errors.

Authors:  M F Brin; A Blitzer
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Routine use of Xeomin in patients previously treated with Botox: long term results.

Authors:  D Dressler
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.089

View more
  30 in total

1.  Comparing incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®): identical potency labelling in the hemidiaphragm assay.

Authors:  Dirk Dressler; Lizhen Pan; Hans Bigalke
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Comparative evaluation of the potency and antigenicity of two distinct BoNT/A-derived formulations.

Authors:  M Brown; G Nicholson; M C Ardila; A Satorius; R S Broide; K Clarke; T Hunt; J Francis
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Clinical Pharmacology of Botulinum Toxin Drugs.

Authors:  Dirk Dressler
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021

Review 4.  Pharmacological differences and clinical implications of various botulinum toxin preparations: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  A Ferrari; M Manca; V Tugnoli; L Alberto
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2018 Jan/Mar

5.  Strategies for treatment of dystonia.

Authors:  Dirk Dressler; Eckart Altenmueller; Roongroj Bhidayasiri; Saeed Bohlega; Pedro Chana; Tae Mo Chung; Steven Frucht; Pedro J Garcia-Ruiz; Alain Kaelin; Ryuji Kaji; Petr Kanovsky; Rainer Laskawi; Federico Micheli; Olga Orlova; Maja Relja; Raymond Rosales; Jaroslaw Slawek; Sofia Timerbaeva; Thomas T Warner; Fereshte Adib Saberi
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Benefits and Risks of Non-Approved Injection Regimens for Botulinum Toxins in Spasticity.

Authors:  Andrea Santamato; Francesco Panza
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Blepharospasm: long-term treatment with either Botox®, Xeomin® or Dysport®.

Authors:  Katja Kollewe; Bahram Mohammadi; Steffen Köhler; Heidrun Pickenbrock; Reinhard Dengler; Dirk Dressler
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Botulinum toxin therapy of cervical dystonia: duration of therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Dirk Dressler; Pawel Tacik; Fereshte Adib Saberi
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 9.  Safety Profile of High-Dose Botulinum Toxin Type A in Post-Stroke Spasticity Treatment.

Authors:  Alessio Baricich; Alessandro Picelli; Andrea Santamato; Stefano Carda; Alessandro de Sire; Nicola Smania; Carlo Cisari; Marco Invernizzi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Differential characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA and its use in the management of glabellar frown lines.

Authors:  Welf Prager
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.