Literature DB >> 21971286

Biochemical signatures of in vitro radiation response in human lung, breast and prostate tumour cells observed with Raman spectroscopy.

Q Matthews1, A Jirasek, J J Lum, A G Brolo.   

Abstract

This work applies noninvasive single-cell Raman spectroscopy (RS) and principal component analysis (PCA) to analyze and correlate radiation-induced biochemical changes in a panel of human tumour cell lines that vary by tissue of origin, p53 status and intrinsic radiosensitivity. Six human tumour cell lines, derived from prostate (DU145, PC3 and LNCaP), breast (MDA-MB-231 and MCF7) and lung (H460), were irradiated in vitro with single fractions (15, 30 or 50 Gy) of 6 MV photons. Remaining live cells were harvested for RS analysis at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h post-irradiation, along with unirradiated controls. Single-cell Raman spectra were acquired from 20 cells per sample utilizing a 785 nm excitation laser. All spectra (200 per cell line) were individually post-processed using established methods and the total data set for each cell line was analyzed with PCA using standard algorithms. One radiation-induced PCA component was detected for each cell line by identification of statistically significant changes in the PCA score distributions for irradiated samples, as compared to unirradiated samples, in the first 24-72 h post-irradiation. These RS response signatures arise from radiation-induced changes in cellular concentrations of aromatic amino acids, conformational protein structures and certain nucleic acid and lipid functional groups. Correlation analysis between the radiation-induced PCA components separates the cell lines into three distinct RS response categories: R1 (H460 and MCF7), R2 (MDA-MB-231 and PC3) and R3 (DU145 and LNCaP). These RS categories partially segregate according to radiosensitivity, as the R1 and R2 cell lines are radioresistant (SF(2) > 0.6) and the R3 cell lines are radiosensitive (SF(2) < 0.5). The R1 and R2 cell lines further segregate according to p53 gene status, corroborated by cell cycle analysis post-irradiation. Potential radiation-induced biochemical response mechanisms underlying our RS observations are proposed, such as (1) the regulated synthesis and degradation of structured proteins and (2) the expression of anti-apoptosis factors or other survival signals. This study demonstrates the utility of RS for noninvasive radiobiological analysis of tumour cell radiation response, and indicates the potential for future RS studies designed to investigate, monitor or predict radiation response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21971286     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/21/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of human lung cancer cell radiosensitivity after irradiations with therapeutic protons and carbon ions.

Authors:  Otilija D Keta; Danijela V Todorović; Tanja M Bulat; Pablo Ga Cirrone; Francesco Romano; Giacomo Cuttone; Ivan M Petrović; Aleksandra M Ristić Fira
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-09-15

2.  Synergetic Influence of Bismuth Oxide Nanoparticles, Cisplatin and Baicalein-Rich Fraction on Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Radiosensitization Effects for Clinical Radiotherapy Beams.

Authors:  Noor Nabilah Talik Sisin; Khairunisak Abdul Razak; Safri Zainal Abidin; Nor Fazila Che Mat; Reduan Abdullah; Raizulnasuha Ab Rashid; Muhammad Afiq Khairil Anuar; Wan Nordiana Rahman
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-12

3.  Monitoring Protein Denaturation of Egg White Using Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR).

Authors:  Igor Goryanin; Lev Ovchinnikov; Sergey Vesnin; Yuri Ivanov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-19

4.  Raman profile alterations of irradiated human nasopharyngeal cancer cells detected with laser tweezer Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sufang Qiu; Youliang Weng; Ying Li; Yang Chen; Yuhui Pan; Jun Liu; Wanzun Lin; Xiaochuan Chen; Miaomiao Li; Ting Lin; Wei Liu; Lurong Zhang; Duo Lin
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Raman spectroscopic study of radioresistant oral cancer sublines established by fractionated ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Mohd Yasser; Rubina Shaikh; Murali Krishna Chilakapati; Tanuja Teni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of silver nanoparticles coated with anti-HER2 on irradiation efficiency of SKBR3 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Shahin Aghamiri; Ali Jafarpour; Mohsen Shoja
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Molecular features unique to glioblastoma radiation resistant residual cells may affect patient outcome - a short report.

Authors:  Ekjot Kaur; Jayant S Goda; Atanu Ghorai; Sameer Salunkhe; Prakash Shetty; Aliasgar V Moiyadi; Epari Sridhar; Abhishek Mahajan; Rakesh Jalali; Shilpee Dutt
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 7.051

8.  Radiation-Induced Glycogen Accumulation Detected by Single Cell Raman Spectroscopy Is Associated with Radioresistance that Can Be Reversed by Metformin.

Authors:  Quinn Matthews; Martin Isabelle; Samantha J Harder; Julian Smazynski; Wayne Beckham; Alexandre G Brolo; Andrew Jirasek; Julian J Lum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Raman spectroscopy identifies radiation response in human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Samantha J Harder; Martin Isabelle; Lindsay DeVorkin; Julian Smazynski; Wayne Beckham; Alexandre G Brolo; Julian J Lum; Andrew Jirasek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Upcoming imaging concepts and their impact on treatment planning and treatment response in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Paul Russell Roberts; Ashesh B Jani; Satyaseelan Packianathan; Ashley Albert; Rahul Bhandari; Srinivasan Vijayakumar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.