Literature DB >> 21970947

A quantitative collagen fibers orientation assessment using birefringence measurements: calibration and application to human osteons.

Ewa M Spiesz1, Werner Kaminsky, Philippe K Zysset.   

Abstract

Even though mechanical properties depend strongly on the arrangement of collagen fibers in mineralized tissues, it is not yet well resolved. Only a few semi-quantitative evaluations of the fiber arrangement in bone, like spectroscopic techniques or circularly polarized light microscopy methods are available. In this study the out-of-plane collagen arrangement angle was calibrated to the linear birefringence of a longitudinally fibered mineralized turkey leg tendon cut at variety of angles to the main axis. The calibration curve was applied to human cortical bone osteons to quantify the out-of-plane collagen fibers arrangement. The proposed calibration curve is normalized to sample thickness and wavelength of the probing light to enable a universally applicable quantitative assessment. This approach may improve our understanding of the fibrillar structure of bone and its implications on mechanical properties. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21970947      PMCID: PMC3218218          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


Introduction

Composites with fibers reinforcement are a very frequent motives in the design of natural materials (Fratzl and Weinkamer, 2007). A complex design is required as fibers are usually strong in tension, but rather weak in compression, as they tend to buckle easily. Tissue mineralization is widely used as a predictor of mechanical performance of mineralized tissues, but as the correlation between the mineral content and stiffness measured for example with nanoindentation technique is rather moderate (Boivin et al., 2008; Follet et al., 2004; Zebaze et al., 2011), the attempts of including other factors like morphology of the organic matrix are gaining attention (Siegmund et al., 2008; Willems et al., 2011). Not only volume fraction of organic matter (Reisinger et al., 2010), but also spatial arrangements are of interest for understanding the exceptional elastic properties of bone. The question of how the mineralized collagen fibers are arranged in the extracellular matrix of bone was investigated for over a century, but there is no full agreement on its details. A first model of arrangement of collagen in lamellae was proposed by Gebhard in 1906. The model assumed an unidirectional arrangement of the fibers with an abrupt change of 90° between neighboring lamellae. The next model by Ascenzi and Bonucci (1967, 1968) assumed osteons with mainly longitudinal, transverse or alternating fibril orientation. More recent works present a view that the arrangement of fibers in a lamella follows a certain orientation pattern. The most popular models are the orthogonal plywood pattern similar to the model of Gebhard and that of twisted plywood, characterized by a continuous fibril rotation. A more refined model was proposed by Weiner et al. (1997, 1999), where a single lamella is divided into five sublayers with consecutive rotation of the fibers of 30°. A simulation study by Reisinger et al. (2011) showed that different collagen orientation patterns lead to different elastic properties and anisotropy of a lamella. The models fitting the experimental nanoindentation results best were those by Weiner (Weiner et al., 1999; Wagermaier et al., 2006). Some methods of direct measurement of collagen out-of-plane orientation (the angle that collagen fibers make with the normal to the specimen surface) are available, like for example scanning small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) (Wagermaier et al., 2006). Polarized light measurements were applied to assess the collagen arrangement, but not in a fully quantitative way by Martin and Ishida (1989), Boyde and Riggs (1990), Hengsberger et al. (2002), Bromage et al. (2003) and Skedros et al. (2009), even though birefringence measurement techniques are frequently used as a standard tool in studying anisotropic properties of materials for nearly 200 years (Pajdzik and Glazer, 2006). Quantitative birefringence assessment requires additional components for the optical set-up (like optical retarders, for the full filters arrangement see Kaminsky et al. (2007)). Some methods allow quantitative measurements of two dimensional linear birefringence (Geday et al., 2000). An addition of a sample tilting stage provides three dimensional maps of birefringence and eigen rays (Pajdzik and Glazer, 2006). Recently, a technique allowing a simultaneous imaging of birefringence from four quadrants of a single image at camera speed was developed by Kaminsky et al. (2007). This method, previously applied to some examples from the fields of biology and materials sciences, was here calibrated for the use on mineralized tissues (mineralized turkey leg tendon – MTLT and osteonal bone). In previous implementations of polarized light methods, the assumption was made that osteons appear completely bright or dark when they are composed of mostly transversely or longitudinally oriented fibers (Boyde and Riggs, 1990; Martin et al., 1996). In between, a brightness ratio was used as indicator of the fraction of longitudinal versus transverse fibers in a sample (Boyde and Riggs, 1990; Ramasamy and Akkus, 2007). This allowed for a comparative evaluation of collagen arrangement in distinct parts of bone (Kalmey and Lovejoy, 2002; Goldman et al., 2003), but did not provide fully quantitative information on the out-of-plane collagen arrangement angle. Additionally the thickness of samples used in the studies was not included in transformation of the birefringence information to the preferred collagen arrangement angle and therefore had to be normalized (Boyde and Riggs, 1990). Alternatively a scale describing six secondary osteons morphotypes was proposed by Martin et al. (1996) and than updated by Skedros et al. (2009). The scale describes different osteons types based on birefringence patterns and assigns scores to each. Averaging over large fields of view results in an average score that is correlated to the average collagen arrangement in a bone section. No quantitative data on the actual out-of-plane collagen angle is provided, but the trends describing mostly transversely or mostly longitudinally arranged fibers are well represented. As the anisotropy of bone structure reflects its organization, some acoustic microscopy studies could provide information about bone ultrastructure. Turner et al. (1995) measured the average out-of-plane collagen angle of 30° in demineralized osteonal bone. Some attempts of understanding the arrangement of collagen fibers in osteons was made using Raman microspectroscopic imaging (Kazanci et al., 2006, 2007; Gamsjaeger et al., 2010) providing insight into the organization of bone at the ultrastructural level. This technique requires critical data analysis due to a dependency of the mineral to matrix ratios on materials composition and/or orientation. Measurements of ν1PO4/amide I ratios as a function of light polarization angle showed trends that are promising for evaluation of collagen arrangement in bone (Gamsjaeger et al., 2010). Another method of evaluation of collagen alignment in mineralized tissues is the second harmonic generation microscopy (SHG) that utilizes nonlinear scattering of photons from collagen fibers. Maps trends of collagen being aligned more within or transverse to the measurement plane are created (Cox et al., 2003; Burket et al., 2011), but no quantitative information is available. In this study we extended the idea of calibration of the circularly polarized light microscopy technique on an uniaxial mineralized collagenous tissue previously proposed by Bromage et al. (2003). To achieve quantitative information about the birefringence, a model tissue of mineralized turkey leg tendon containing longitudinally arranged mineralized collagen fibers was cut at five angles with respect to its main axis and imaged with polarized light. A calibration curve, taking into account sample thickness, wavelength of the light and non-linear relationship of birefringence and out-of-plane fiber angle, was proposed based on the readings on MTLT. The calibration curve was than used on human femur secondary osteons.

Methods

Samples

MTLT was used as a model for calibration of the birefringence. This tissue is composed of mineralized collagen fibers – similar in constitution to bone, but with much simpler, uniform arrangement, approximately parallel to the main axis of the tendon. MTLT shows two different morphologies, one highly mineralized and very porous and one with low porosity, densely packed collagen fibers and mineralization similar to that of human cortex. The phase more similar to bone in composition and morphology was chosen for the calibration purposes, as the volume fraction of collagen fibrils, as well as, nanoporosity might affect the observed birefringence (Bromage et al., 2003). For the calibration, 35 fully mineralized MTLT samples were embedded in epoxy resin. Each sample was cut at five different angles to the tendons main axis 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 (±5)° (Fig. 1) and mounted to glass slides to obtain an uniform section thickness. All sections were polished to the thickness of approximately 30–60 (±5) μm and thickness was recorded with a microscope with a calibrated precision stage in the z direction. Normalization of the readings for sample thickness was necessary to make the calibration universally applicable, while other investigators had to ensure an uniform sample thicknesses in order to make inter-specimen comparisons (Bromage et al., 2003).
Fig. 1

Samples extraction scheme and the resulting ∣sin(δ)∣ false-colored images.

Additionally, thin slices of seven mid-shaft human femur samples were prepared with the same protocol as the MTLT samples. Birefringence was measured in about 200 regions of interest. The obtained calibration curve was applied to transform the ∣sin(δ)∣ readings into the out of plane collagen angle. The collagen arrangement in about 300 osteons was quantitatively assessed.

Birefringence measurements

An automated technique was applied, based on the rotating polarizer method to unfold quantitatively birefringence, eigenmodes and absorption, where an object is simultaneously imaged at four different polarizer angles in a single image implementing an image multiplexer (Quadview, MAG Biosystems) (Kaminsky et al., 2007). In this way the noise contributions coming from camera drifts, fluctuations of light source and mechanical instabilities of the optical system set-up are minimized (Kaminsky et al., 2007). The system used consisted of a microscope for polarized light, interference filter and broadband quarter-wave retarder to produce incident circular polarized light, as well as the image multiplexer and a CCD camera. Background correction was performed to ensure uniform illumination of the whole field of view in the microscope. The image multiplexer used here contained four polarizers placed at 0°, 45°, 90°, 135° with respect to a horizontal reference, allowing the incident circularly polarized light to go through a sample to the four polarizers simultaneously. The birefringence is measured as a sinusoidal function:where Δn is the birefringence, n and n are the refractive indices in the direction of extraordinary and ordinary rays, respectively, and θ is the angle which the wave normal s makes with the z-axis, which is related to the MTLT fibers and defines the out-of-plane angle of the z-axis (see Appendix for the derivation of the formula). The phase difference δ between the two light paths (two rays traveling with different velocities – subject to different refractive indices n, n), after the recombination of the rays is a measure of the optical anisotropy of the material (Pajdzik and Glazer, 2006). The phase difference is given by: with L – sample thickness, λ – wavelength of the light. Replacing Δn with Eq. (16) we obtain: In the false colored images the red pixel readings correlate linearly to ∣sin(δ)∣ . The two morphology zones of MTLT were segmented based on the intensity images. The zone more similar to cortical bone was used for the calibration purposes quantifying the average birefringence of this zone within each image. Pores were also segmented based on the intensity images (Goldman et al., 2003). The fringe-order of the sinusoidal function in Eq. (3) is ambiguous (unless relatively low birefringence is observed), but can be resolved with multiwavelength measurement (Geday et al., 2000). In this study measurements of the ∣sin(δ)∣ were performed at 550 and 600 nm and the ambiguity elimination procedure described in Geday et al. (2000) was applied. Solving Eq. (3) for the angle which the wave normal s makes with the optical axis θ introduced into the uniaxial MTLT samples by special angled cuts (see Fig. 1) leads to:with the calibration factor c:

Results

Mean values of thickness normalized ∣sin(δ)∣ readings were calculated for each region of interest in an acquired image. The ambiguity in the phase measurements was solved using two wavelength measurements. Pixels showing ∣sin(δ)∣ from other than the first fringe were discarded in the calibration procedure (Pajdzik and Glazer, 2006). The calibration factor c was determined from Eq. (5) to 0.038. The resulting calibration curve is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Calibration curve describing relationship between the collagen out-of-plane fibers angle θ and the measured phase factor δ. Error bars in the δ/L represent one standard deviation. Sample cut angles θ were accurate within about 5°.

Application to human midshaft osteons

The dependency between ∣sin(δ)∣ and out-of-plane collagen arrangement angle θ calibrated on MTLT was applied in osteonal bone (see Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Collagen out-of-plane angles θ evaluated using the calibration curve on a mid-shaft of human femur. Bar 100 μm.

The average out-of-plane collagen angle measured on the midshaft sections of human femurs was 25.8° with standard deviation of 1.3°. Exemplary results are shown in Fig. 3. Different types of osteons were visible, for example osteons with frequently changing collagen arrangement angle between adjacent lamellae (Fig. 3a), called the distributed osteons by Martin et al. (1996). On the other hand, in some osteons the changes were not so frequent (Fig. 3d), with groups of a few lamellae arranged in similar directions next to a few with another one (called hoop osteons in Martin’s scale). Some osteons showed very little changes in collagen arrangement (Fig. 3b), alternatively dark osteons. An additionally altered collagen arrangement was observed in vicinity of osteocytes (Fig. 3b), exhibiting more of the circumferential type of tissue (Fig. 3c), where the collagen fibers, showing higher birefringence, were arranged longitudinally.

Discussion

In this study a technique allowing for quantitative assessment of birefringence was calibrated for universal use in mineralized tissues. We believe this is a promising attempt for quantification of collagen fiber arrangement in cortical bone, which is a curtail parameter in many models and can improve our general understanding of the principles underlying the exceptional mechanical properties of bone. The average collagen orientation observed on seven samples of human femur was about 26°, which is in good agreement with the observations made by Turner et al. (1995) from acoustic microscopy showing a “principal orientation” of collagen at ∼30° to the long axis of bone. The acoustic microscope used for the study allowed for a depth resolution of 60 μm. The output of the quantitative light microscopy technique we are introducing here gives the average over the sample thickness seen in transmission at sample thickness of 30–60 μm (resolution in the z direction) which allows for a direct comparison to the acoustic microscopic study, but is in general a limitation of the spatial resolution that can be obtained with the technique. Additionally the study by Turner et al. (1995) showed a misalignment of mineral (that was on average oriented along the long axis of bone) and collagen. The result was interpreted as the contribution of the extrafibrillar mineral, as the interfibrillar mineral is rather well aligned with the collagen fibrils (Gupta et al., 2005; Olszta et al., 2007; Balooch et al., 2008). According to Weiner et al. (1999) each lamella is composed of five sublayers with collagen fibers rotating progressively about 30° in each. For the sublayers thicknesses presented in that work, the maximum stiffness of such a lamella was predicted in the direction of 12.6° out of plane by Reisinger et al. (2011). Osteons containing lamellae with a similar average collagen arrangement were observed frequently (example in Fig. 3b).Wagermaier et al. (2006) resolved a local crystallite orientation of several osteons of human midshaft femur using scanning X-ray diffraction with a micron-sized synchrotron beam (SAXS/WAXD). The variation of the out-of-plane arrangement of mineral crystallites was 10–60° to the osteon axis and was decreasing with the distance from the Haversian channel. If the arrangement of collagen fibers is assumed to be compliant with the arrangement of the c axis of the mineral platelets (Gupta et al., 2005), this could be compared to our results, with the caveat of a potential dependency on the mineral distribution between collagen fibrils and extrafibrillar matrix, as mentioned above (Turner et al., 1995). The average orientation measured with the X-ray diffraction was 30°, similar to what was measured by Turner (Turner et al., 1995) and our results. Wagermaier et al. suggested a 3D helicoidal arrangement of the fibrils around the Haversial channel, since the angles measured were varying within one quadrant. The main advantage of such structures is their higher extensibility in tension and compression, compared to an orthogonal plywood structures (Wagermaier et al., 2006). Anisotropy of a structure with this arrangement is in agreement with the anisotropy predicted by Reisinger et al. (2011) to be about 1.13 (±0.07) for an osteon composed as described by Wagermaier et al. (2006). This fits reasonably to the measured ratio of 1.25 (±0.18) (Franzoso and Zysset, 2009), supporting the helicoidal structure hypothesis in its mechanical implications. The advantage of using the technique proposed here, over for example SAXS/WAXS techniques, is the possibility of obtaining quantitative information about the collagen fibers arrangement of relatively large regions of the tissue in short experiment time. The limitations of the technique are: the need of thin samples preparation (and control of the thickness) and the fact that volume fraction of the tissue and its degree of mineralization might influence the results. Multiwavelength measurements are required to resolve periodicity ambiguity of the ∣sin(δ)∣ function. Additionally, slight artifacts were observed in some of the osteon images that manifested in asymmetry of the birefringence readings (as for example in Fig. 3d). Because there is no overall preferred direction common to all images we can conclude that the set-up of polarizing components did not introduce any such artifacts but that they are typical for the samples measured and may indicate background effects from the sample preparation which involved polymers. The effect was taken care in the data analysis by averaging over many samples. As a validation of the accuracy of the collagen arrangement measurements, spectroscopic (IR and Raman) studies on the angled MTLT samples are planned. Our approach could be extended to other (bio-)materials with birefringent fibers. Further investigations of the collagen out-of-plane angle dependent on physiological location, age, gender and other factors are planned on secondary and primary osteons, as well as, on trabecular bone. Additionally, a combination of the out-of-plane collagen arrangement with the in-plane arrangement assessment that can be as well resolved with polarized light is planned.
  31 in total

1.  3-dimensional imaging of collagen using second harmonic generation.

Authors:  Guy Cox; Eleanor Kable; Allan Jones; Ian Fraser; Frank Manconi; Mark D Gorrell
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 2.  Circularly polarized light standards for investigations of collagen fiber orientation in bone.

Authors:  Timothy G Bromage; Haviva M Goldman; Shannon C McFarlin; Johanna Warshaw; Alan Boyde; Christopher M Riggs
Journal:  Anat Rec B New Anat       Date:  2003-09

3.  Elastic anisotropy of bone lamellae as a function of fibril orientation pattern.

Authors:  Andreas G Reisinger; Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Spiral twisting of fiber orientation inside bone lamellae.

Authors:  W Wagermaier; H S Gupta; A Gourrier; M Burghammer; P Roschger; P Fratzl
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.456

5.  Simultaneous false-colour imaging of birefringence, extinction and transmittance at camera speed.

Authors:  W Kaminsky; E Gunn; R Sours; B Kahr
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Differences in the degree of bone tissue mineralization account for little of the differences in tissue elastic properties.

Authors:  Roger M D Zebaze; Anthony C Jones; Marcus G Pandy; Mark A Knackstedt; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone osteonal tissues by Raman spectral mapping: orientation-composition.

Authors:  M Kazanci; P Roschger; E P Paschalis; K Klaushofer; P Fratzl
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2006-07-16       Impact factor: 2.867

8.  The compressive properties of single osteons.

Authors:  A Ascenzi; E Bonucci
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1968-07

9.  Local variations in the micromechanical properties of mouse femur: the involvement of collagen fiber orientation and mineralization.

Authors:  J G Ramasamy; O Akkus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Collagen fiber orientation in the femoral necks of apes and humans: do their histological structures reflect differences in locomotor loading?

Authors:  J K Kalmey; C O Lovejoy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  13 in total

1.  Collagen fiber orientation pattern, osteon morphology and distribution, and presence of laminar histology do not distinguish torsion from bending in bat and pigeon wing bones.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Madison S Doutré
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Effect of circularly polarized light on germination, hypocotyl elongation and biomass production of arabidopsis and lettuce: Involvement of phytochrome B.

Authors:  Enkhsukh Lkhamkhuu; Kazunori Zikihara; Hitomi Katsura; Satoru Tokutomi; Takafumi Hosokawa; Yoshihisa Usami; Mitsuyoshi Ichihashi; Junji Yamaguchi; Kenji Monde
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 1.133

3.  Elastic anisotropy of uniaxial mineralized collagen fibers measured using two-directional indentation. Effects of hydration state and indentation depth.

Authors:  Ewa M Spiesz; Paul Roschger; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-03-20

4.  Computational and experimental methodology for site-matched investigations of the influence of mineral mass fraction and collagen orientation on the axial indentation modulus of lamellar bone.

Authors:  Ewa M Spiesz; Andreas G Reisinger; Werner Kaminsky; Paul Roschger; Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-07-29

5.  Tendon extracellular matrix damage, degradation and inflammation in response to in vitro overload exercise.

Authors:  Ewa M Spiesz; Chavaunne T Thorpe; Saira Chaudhry; Graham P Riley; Helen L Birch; Peter D Clegg; Hazel R C Screen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  The Morphogenesis of Cranial Sutures in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Jolanta M Topczewska; Ramy A Shoela; Joanna P Tomaszewski; Rupa B Mirmira; Arun K Gosain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Structure and collagen crimp patterns of functionally distinct equine tendons, revealed by quantitative polarised light microscopy (qPLM).

Authors:  Ewa M Spiesz; Chavaunne T Thorpe; Philipp J Thurner; Hazel R C Screen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review.

Authors:  Joseph Chue-Sang; Mariacarla Gonzalez; Angie Pierre; Megan Laughrey; Ilyas Saytashev; Tatiana Novikova; Jessica C Ramella-Roman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Microfibril orientation dominates the microelastic properties of human bone tissue at the lamellar length scale.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Aurélien Gourrier; Fabienne Rupin; Kay Raum; Françoise Peyrin; Manfred Burghammer; Amena Saïed; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Polarized light microscopy for 3-dimensional mapping of collagen fiber architecture in ocular tissues.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Ning-Jiun Jan; Bryn Brazile; Andrew Voorhees; Kira L Lathrop; Ian A Sigal
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.