Literature DB >> 21970900

Comparison of choroidal and retinal endothelial cells: characteristics and response to VEGF isoforms and anti-VEGF treatments.

Elizabeth A Stewart1, Govindi J Samaranayake, Andrew C Browning, Andrew Hopkinson, Winfried M Amoaku.   

Abstract

Neovascular eye diseases such as wet age-related macular degeneration and proliferative diabetic retinopathy are two of the most common causes of irreversible visual loss. Although mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the mechanisms of these diseases are not fully understood. Molecular inhibitors of VEGF including pegaptanib, ranibizumab and bevacizumab are used as treatments for these diseases. However, there have been very few direct comparisons between these agents, and as dose and treatment regimes differ their relative efficacies are hard to determine. In vitro comparisons tend to use cells from different sites or species, which show heterogeneity in their responses. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of primary cultures of isolated human choroidal endothelial cells (hCEC) and retinal endothelial cells (hREC), and their proliferation responses to stimulation with VEGF 121 and 165, and to compare the anti-proliferative effects of these three drugs. hCEC and hREC were positive for the cell markers VEGFR1, VEGFR2, CD31, CD34 and von Willebrand's factor (vWF), with greater expression of CD34 on the hREC compared to hCEC. Contrary to previous assumptions VEGF isoforms 121 and 165 were found to be equally potent in stimulating endothelial cell proliferation. However, hREC exhibited higher proliferation with either VEGF isoform compared to hCEC. The anti-VEGF treatments ranibizumab and bevacizumab were effective in decreasing proliferation of hCEC induced by the two VEGF isoforms, individually and in combination, with ranibizumab being moderately more effective, particularly in hREC. Pegaptanib was effective in controlling the proliferation of hCEC stimulated by VEGF 165, but was ineffective against the stimulatory effect of VEGF 121. There were found to be significant differences in microvascular endothelial cells from the retina and choroid, both in the expression of cell markers and their behaviour in response to growth factors and currently available anti-VEGF agents, highlighting the importance of targeting treatments to specific intraocular vascular beds and/or diseases.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21970900     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  25 in total

1.  Inhibition of proliferation of retinal vascular endothelial cells more effectively than choroidal vascular endothelial cell proliferation by bevacizumab.

Authors:  Bharani Krishna Mynampati; Kumar Sambhav; Sandeep Grover; Kakarla V Chalam
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  SiRNA silencing of VEGF, IGFs, and their receptors in human retinal microvascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Yona Nicolau; Fayez Bany-Mohammed; Charles L Cai; Jacob V Aranda; Kay D Beharry
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Autophagy activation and the mechanism of retinal microvascular endothelial cells in hypoxia.

Authors:  Rong Li; Li-Zhao Wang; Jun-Hui Du; Lei Zhao; Yang Yao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Complement activation and choriocapillaris loss in early AMD: implications for pathophysiology and therapy.

Authors:  S Scott Whitmore; Elliott H Sohn; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 5.  Role of the retinal vascular endothelial cell in ocular disease.

Authors:  Arpita S Bharadwaj; Binoy Appukuttan; Phillip A Wilmarth; Yuzhen Pan; Andrew J Stempel; Timothy J Chipps; Eric E Benedetti; David O Zamora; Dongseok Choi; Larry L David; Justine R Smith
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Three-dimensional tubule formation assay as therapeutic screening model for ocular microvascular disorders.

Authors:  Mahnaz Shariatzadeh; Maarten M Brandt; Caroline Cheng; Josianne C Ten Berge; Aniki Rothova; Pieter J M Leenen; Willem A Dik
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Molecular mechanisms of (R,R)ZX-5 on NO synthesis and its anti-angiogenic effect.

Authors:  Li Pan; Jia-Liang Hu; Wen-Jing Wang; Xiao-Juan Zhang; Jin Wei; Zhen-Dong Liu; Yi-Hua Zhang; Han-Mei Xu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  Actions of bevacizumab and ranibizumab on microvascular retinal endothelial cells: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Heidrun L Deissler; Helmut Deissler; Gabriele E Lang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Fasting and fasting-mimicking treatment activate SIRT1/LXRα and alleviate diabetes-induced systemic and microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Sandra S Hammer; Cristiano P Vieira; Delaney McFarland; Maximilian Sandler; Yan Levitsky; Tim F Dorweiler; Todd A Lydic; Bright Asare-Bediako; Yvonne Adu-Agyeiwaah; Micheli S Sielski; Mariana Dupont; Ana Leda Longhini; Sergio Li Calzi; Dibyendu Chakraborty; Gail M Seigel; Denis A Proshlyakov; Maria B Grant; Julia V Busik
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 10.460

10.  Suitability of endogenous reference genes for gene expression studies with human intraocular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Ruoxin Wei; Elizabeth Anne Stewart; Winfried M Amoaku
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.