Literature DB >> 21969996

Model checking with residuals for g-estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Benjamin Rich1, Erica E M Moodie, David A Stephens, Robert W Platt.   

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss model checking with residual diagnostic plots for g-estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes. The g-estimation method requires three different model specifications at each treatment interval under consideration: (1) the blip model; (2) the expected counterfactual model; and (3) the propensity model. Of these, the expected counterfactual model is especially difficult to specify correctly in practice and so far there has been little guidance as to how to check for model misspecification. Residual plots are a useful and standard tool for model diagnostics in the classical regression setting; we have adapted this approach for g-estimation. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach in a simulation study, and apply it to real data in the context of estimating the optimal time to stop breastfeeding.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21969996     DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  6 in total

1.  Q-learning residual analysis: application to the effectiveness of sequences of antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Susan Shortreed; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Downstream Effects of Upstream Causes.

Authors:  Bradley C Saul; Michael G Hudgens; Michael A Mallin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Estimating the Causal Effect of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation on Survival in Patients with Acute Lung Injury.

Authors:  Weiwei Wang; Daniel Scharfstein; Chenguang Wang; Michael Daniels; Dale Needham; Roy Brower
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 1.864

5.  Interactive model building for Q-learning.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Kristin A Linn; Leonard A Stefanski
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Estimation and evaluation of linear individualized treatment rules to guarantee performance.

Authors:  Xin Qiu; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.