Literature DB >> 21969885

Synergistic gangrene of the breast in a patient with type 2 diabetes.

Jody Parker1, Sivakumaran Sabanathan.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969885      PMCID: PMC3184014          DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JRSM Short Rep        ISSN: 2042-5333


× No keyword cloud information.
This article aims to highlight the importance of diagnosing serious soft tissue infections and instigating treatment rapidly.

Introduction

Synergistic gangrene is an uncommon soft tissue infection classically occurring at surgical sites. Primary cases are rare but a high index of suspicion is paramount in treating the disease successfully. We present the first case of primary synergistic gangrene affecting the breast which was successfully managed through a combination of resuscitation, parenteral antibiotics and surgery. It is reasonable to suggest that such cases may increase in incidence and all physicians treating soft tissue infections must be aware of this potentially fatal pathology.

Case presentation

A 39-year-old woman with a history of type 2 diabetes, deep vein thrombosis, gastritis, schizophrenia and self-harm presented to the medical admissions unit with a one-week history of a right sub-mammary abscess followed by spreading cellulitis of the breast. On examination she was septic with a pyrexia of 39.2, blood pressure of 127/65 and tachycardia of 110. Examination of the breast revealed widespread cellulitis involving the nipple and sub-mammary area spreading to the axilla. Initial blood tests showed a white cell count of 23.8 (neutrophils 19.9) and CRP of 428. Simple cellulitis was diagnosed by the admitting physicians and she was commenced on parenteral antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. Her condition worsened despite intravenous benzyl penicillin and flucloxacillin. A surgical opinion was sought on day three when she had evidence of synergistic gangrene. The cellulitis had now spread and there were areas of growing necrotic ulceration (Figure 1). Resuscitation was commenced and antibiotic therapy was adjusted to imipenem and clindamycin based on local necrotizing fasciitis guidelines. She was taken to theatre within a few hours where a partial mastectomy was performed and the wound was left open and packed (Figure 2). Postoperatively she remained stable on intensive care. The following day she returned to theatre for further debridement.
Figure 1

Preoperative and postoperative images of the right breast. Note the presence of the ulcerative necrotic areas which had rapidly appeared. Radical debridement was performed to eliminate all the diseased tissue and further debridement was performed the following day

Figure 2

After initial debridement. Extensive removal of diseased tissue was performed and is necessary to control the spread of infection. Secondary closure was subsequently performed on day 13 after her initial procedure

Preoperative and postoperative images of the right breast. Note the presence of the ulcerative necrotic areas which had rapidly appeared. Radical debridement was performed to eliminate all the diseased tissue and further debridement was performed the following day After initial debridement. Extensive removal of diseased tissue was performed and is necessary to control the spread of infection. Secondary closure was subsequently performed on day 13 after her initial procedure The wound was monitored closely and a vacuum dressing was applied to aid healing. Signs of sepsis improved and she returned to the ward on the fifth postoperative day. Nutritional supplements and adequate hydration were continued during her recovery. Secondary closure was performed on day 13 after the initial operation and there was no further breakdown or compromise of the remaining tissues. Preoperative cultures taken from the ulcers identified a mixture of gram positive and negative bacteria including Bacteroides spp (sensitive to metronidazole, clindamycin and imipenem). Histology confirmed widespread microscopic changes and abscess formation consistent with gangrene. There was no evidence of malignancy. Blood markers of infection progressively improved and there were no signs of secondary organ failure during her recovery. She was discharged 22 days after her initial admission. Intravenous antibiotics were administered for a total of 10 days after the first debridement which were changed to an extended period of oral antibiotics up until her discharge (co amoxiclav and metronidazole). Follow-up has been arranged where the possibility of reconstruction will be considered.

Discussion

Synergistic gangrene is a rare but potentially fatal polymicrobial soft tissue infection involving organisms creating synergistic virulence.[1,2] It is considered a separate entity to necrotizing fasciitis and the course is often more insidious. Inoculation occurs from a surgical incision or drain site and conditions affecting the immune response are risk factors, especially diabetes and obesity.[3-5] Synergistic gangrene is mostly seen at surgical sites such as the abdomen or back[6,7] but cases involving the peri-anal region and vulva with no proceeding trauma have been reported.[3-5] It is characterized by spreading cellulitis followed by the formation of central ulcerated areas covered with eschar and necrosis which grow relentlessly unless treated.[8] By this time the patient will be toxic with extensive tissue loss having already occurred. There are few reports of synergistic gangrene beyond surgical wounds with no documented cases of the breast as a primary site. A single case of synergistic gangrene with secondary involvement of the breast has been described among a series in the literature.[5] Mastectomy was performed but the patient subsequently died due to septicaemia and uncontrolled diabetes. Despite there being considerable discrepancy in the agreed diagnostic criteria, the literature is unanimous in the requirement for prompt, aggressive antibiotic therapy and early, radical surgical intervention.[3,7-9] Given these patients may present to a range of non-surgical specialties, early assessment and referral is of vital importance. Outlined below is our management strategy for this case which will serve as a guide for other clinicians treating synergistic gangrene. It is reasonable to expect more cases of synergistic gangrene due to the increase in immunosuppressive conditions. This outline will help guide the professionals these patients may present to and highlights the importance of prompt identification and surgical intervention. The prognosis of synergistic gangrene however, remains poor.[9] Despite aggressive treatment, there is often a delay in diagnosis by which time patients are systemically unwell. Mortality rates have been reported of 12.5% in those debrided within 24 h, in contrast to 72.7% delayed by four days.[5] Resuscitation and supportive treatment: Large volumes of fluid can become sequestered in tissues and surface appearance may under represent that of underlying tissue damage. Fluid replacement should be guided by local policy. Postoperative complications are likely in these patients including multi-organ dysfunction, myocardial infarction, thrombosis and secondary sources of infection.[3-5] Adequate steps are required to prevent these in addition to meeting nutritional needs to allow an appropriate immune response and adequate wound healing. Hyperbaric wound oxygenation has also been reported as an adjunct, but its efficacy is uncertain;[5,7,9] Broad spectrum antibiotics: The ideal choice of antibiotics is difficult to ascertain due to significant bacterial heterogeneity and low frequency of this condition. Most follow necrotizing fasciitis guidelines with reasonable effect.[3-5,9] Microbiologists should be involved early. Our regime involved intravenous imipenem 500 mg QDS and clindamycin 600 mg QDS for 10 days followed by co amoxiclav 625 mg QDS and metronidazole 500 mg TDS orally for a further two weeks; Surgical debridement: The infection can spread quickly causing marked local tissue destruction. Radical and often multiple surgical debridements may be required to remove all the diseased tissue.[3] Secondary closure should only be attempted once tissues are viable and nutritional and physiological state allows. Operative samples should be sent for histological and microbiological analysis. This report describes an unusual case of primary synergistic gangrene affecting the breast and explains our strategy for successful treatment which shows that with punctual diagnosis and appropriate intervention that fatality is not inevitable.

DECLARATIONS

Competing interests

None declared

Funding

None

Ethical approval

Written informed consent to publication was obtained from the patient or next of kin

Guarantor

JP

Contributorship

JP summarized the case and performed the literature review; SS supervised and proofread the manuscript

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient for allowing them to publish the case report and use the images taken during her stay in hospital

Reviewer

Fadi Hajjaj
  8 in total

1.  Meleney's synergistic gangrene: a case study.

Authors:  E A Howse
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Post-caesarean Meleney's gangrene revisited.

Authors:  T Kulkarni; R Arora; N Looker
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Postoperative synergistic gangrene after spinal fusion.

Authors:  C P Kauffman; C M Bono; P P Vessa; K G Swan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Diagnosis of Meleney's synergistic gangrene.

Authors:  J Davson; D M Jones; L Turner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Management of synergistic bacterial gangrene in severely immunocompromised patients. Report of four cases.

Authors:  M Williamson; A Thomas; D J Webster; H L Young
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Current hypotheses on synergistic microbial gangrene.

Authors:  D Kingston; D V Seal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Necrotizing fasciitis and progressive bacterial synergistic gangrene of the vulva.

Authors:  R M Meltzer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  [Infections of soft tissues by bacterial synergism].

Authors:  A Fichelle; M Nimier
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  1990
  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of Primary Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Breast: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryan D Konik; Gregory S Huang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 2.  Molecular Methodologies for Improved Polymicrobial Sepsis Diagnosis.

Authors:  Mariam Doualeh; Matthew Payne; Edward Litton; Edward Raby; Andrew Currie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Breast gangrene: a rare source of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Swati Agrawal; Kumar Jayant; Rajendra Agarwal
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.