Literature DB >> 21969549

Full p53 transcriptional activation potential is dispensable for tumor suppression in diverse lineages.

Dadi Jiang1, Colleen A Brady, Thomas M Johnson, Eunice Y Lee, Eunice J Park, Matthew P Scott, Laura D Attardi.   

Abstract

Over half of all human cancers, of a wide variety of types, sustain mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Although p53 limits tumorigenesis through the induction of apoptosis or cell cycle arrest, its molecular mechanism of action in tumor suppression has been elusive. The best-characterized p53 activity in vitro is as a transcriptional activator, but the identification of numerous additional p53 biochemical activities in vitro has made it unclear which mechanism accounts for tumor suppression. Here, we assess the importance of transcriptional activation for p53 tumor suppression function in vivo in several tissues, using a knock-in mouse strain expressing a p53 mutant compromised for transcriptional activation, p53(25,26). p53(25,26) is severely impaired for the transactivation of numerous classical p53 target genes, including p21, Noxa, and Puma, but it retains the ability to activate a small subset of p53 target genes, including Bax. Surprisingly, p53(25,26) can nonetheless suppress tumor growth in cancers derived from the epithelial, mesenchymal, central nervous system, and lymphoid lineages. Therefore, full transactivation of most p53 target genes is dispensable for p53 tumor suppressor function in a range of tissue types. In contrast, a transcriptional activation mutant that is completely defective for transactivation, p53(25,26,53,54), fails to suppress tumor development. These findings demonstrate that transcriptional activation is indeed broadly critical for p53 tumor suppressor function, although this requirement reflects the limited transcriptional activity observed with p53(25,26) rather than robust transactivation of a full complement of p53 target genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969549      PMCID: PMC3193184          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111245108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  Perp-etrating p53-dependent apoptosis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ihrie; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways.

Authors:  John R Jeffers; Evan Parganas; Youngsoo Lee; Chunying Yang; JinLing Wang; Jennifer Brennan; Kirsteen H MacLean; Jiawen Han; Thomas Chittenden; James N Ihle; Peter J McKinnon; John L Cleveland; Gerard P Zambetti
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Suppression of tumorigenesis by the p53 target PUMA.

Authors:  Michael T Hemann; Jack T Zilfou; Zhen Zhao; Darren J Burgess; Gregory J Hannon; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo.

Authors:  Andrea Ventura; David G Kirsch; Margaret E McLaughlin; David A Tuveson; Jan Grimm; Laura Lintault; Jamie Newman; Elizabeth E Reczek; Ralph Weissleder; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Disruption of the ARF-Mdm2-p53 tumor suppressor pathway in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  C M Eischen; J D Weber; M F Roussel; C J Sherr; J L Cleveland
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Loss of p53 but not ARF accelerates medulloblastoma in mice heterozygous for patched.

Authors:  C Wetmore; D E Eberhart; T Curran
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Bax loss impairs Myc-induced apoptosis and circumvents the selection of p53 mutations during Myc-mediated lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  C M Eischen; M F Roussel; S J Korsmeyer; J L Cleveland
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins puma and noxa.

Authors:  Andreas Villunger; Ewa M Michalak; Leigh Coultas; Franziska Müllauer; Gunther Böck; Michael J Ausserlechner; Jerry M Adams; Andreas Strasser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  PML is a direct p53 target that modulates p53 effector functions.

Authors:  Elisa de Stanchina; Emmanuelle Querido; Masako Narita; Ramana V Davuluri; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Gerardo Ferbeyre; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Dissecting p53 tumor suppressor functions in vivo.

Authors:  Clemens A Schmitt; Jordan S Fridman; Meng Yang; Eugene Baranov; Robert M Hoffman; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 31.743

View more
  42 in total

1.  The Trp53 delta proline (Trp53ΔP) mouse exhibits increased genome instability and susceptibility to radiation-induced, but not spontaneous, tumor development.

Authors:  Cassandra J Adams; Jennifer S Yu; Jian-Hua Mao; Kuang-Yu Jen; Sylvain V Costes; Mark Wade; Jocelyn Shoemake; Olulanu H Aina; Reyno Del Rosario; Phuong Thuy Menchavez; Robert D Cardiff; Geoffrey M Wahl; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  The Spatiotemporal Pattern and Intensity of p53 Activation Dictates Phenotypic Diversity in p53-Driven Developmental Syndromes.

Authors:  Margot E Bowen; Jacob McClendon; Hannah K Long; Aryo Sorayya; Jeanine L Van Nostrand; Joanna Wysocka; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Ironing out how p53 regulates ferroptosis.

Authors:  Maureen E Murphy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Isg15 controls p53 stability and functions.

Authors:  Yi-Fu Huang; Sheena Wee; Jayantha Gunaratne; David P Lane; Dmitry V Bulavin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  How does p53 induce apoptosis and how does this relate to p53-mediated tumour suppression?

Authors:  Brandon J Aubrey; Gemma L Kelly; Ana Janic; Marco J Herold; Andreas Strasser
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 6.  Genome-wide studies of the transcriptional regulation by p53.

Authors:  Mangmang Li; Yunlong He; Xi Feng; Jing Huang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-02-10

7.  Guilty as CHARGED: p53's expanding role in disease.

Authors:  Jeanine L Van Nostrand; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Amino-terminal p53 mutations lead to expression of apoptosis proficient p47 and prognosticate better survival, but predispose to tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Beng Hooi Phang; Rashidah Othman; Gaelle Bougeard; Ren Hui Chia; Thierry Frebourg; Choong Leong Tang; Peh Yean Cheah; Kanaga Sabapathy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Drugging the p53 pathway: understanding the route to clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Kian Hoe Khoo; Khoo Kian Hoe; Chandra S Verma; David P Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Recognition of the disordered p53 transactivation domain by the transcriptional adapter zinc finger domains of CREB-binding protein.

Authors:  Alexander S Krois; Josephine C Ferreon; Maria A Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.